2011
DOI: 10.1159/000328963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Validity of Serum Macrophage Inhibitor Cytokine and Tissue Polypeptide-Specific Antigen in Pancreatobiliary Diseases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They observed that the mean MIC-1 level in healthy controls, CP and PC was 0.76 ng/ml, 2.36 ng/ml and 5.4 ng/ml respectively. Further studies emphasized the diagnostic efficacy of MIC-1 equivalent to CA19-9 [6], [7]. In our study, the mean plasma MIC-1 levels in these patient groups were 1.5 ng/ml, 1.6 ng/ml and 4.5 ng/ml ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They observed that the mean MIC-1 level in healthy controls, CP and PC was 0.76 ng/ml, 2.36 ng/ml and 5.4 ng/ml respectively. Further studies emphasized the diagnostic efficacy of MIC-1 equivalent to CA19-9 [6], [7]. In our study, the mean plasma MIC-1 levels in these patient groups were 1.5 ng/ml, 1.6 ng/ml and 4.5 ng/ml ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Further, Ozkan et al, observed significantly elevated expression of MIC-1 in PC cases in comparison to other pancreatobilary diseases and healthy controls. It was found to have similar sensitivity as that to CA19.9 (81%) in differentiating PC from other benign diseases [7]. Serum MIC-1 was found to outperform CA19-9 in CA19-9, in differentiating patients with resectable pancreatic cancer from controls [8], [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…[3540] It was considered a good biomarker in discriminating pancreatic and other periampullary cancers. [41,42] However, the relationship between GDF-15 and AP has not been fully illustrated. Our study showed that GDF-15 was an independent marker in identifying severe AP, but the mechanism of GDF-15 in the progression of AP remains unclear and should be elucidated further.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In colon cancer, serum levels were elevated in patients with premalignant colonic polyps, then rose progressively with the evolution of the disease to localized and finally metastatic cancer and predicted disease outcome (Brown et al, 2003) (Figure 4). Subsequent studies by many groups have demonstrated that broadly similar findings can be seen in most, if not all, malignancies, including those of the prostate (Welsh et al, 2003;Bauskin et al, 2005;Rasiah et al, 2006;Brown et al, 2006), breast (Welsh et al, 2003), pancreas (Koopmann et al, 2004;Grote and Logsdon, 2007;Ozkan et al, 2011), ovary (Bock et al, 2010;Staff et al, 2011), and lung (Lerner et al, 2016a).…”
Section: Mic-1/gdf15 Expressionmentioning
confidence: 91%