Diagnostic validity of the MINI-KID disorder classifications in specialized child and adolescent psychiatric outpatient clinics in Sweden

Högberg, Camilla; Billstedt, Eva; Björck, Caroline; Björck, Per-Olof; Ehlers, Stephan; Gustle, Lars‐Henry; Hellner, Clara; Höök, Henrik; Serlachius, Eva; Svensson, Mats; Larsson, Jan‐Olov

doi:10.1186/s12888-019-2121-8

Cited by 27 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…shown test-retest reliability and validity comparable to other standardized diagnostic interviews and is claimed to be a useful tool for diagnostic screening in Child and Adolescent Psychiatric care (47).…”

Section: Self-report Xmentioning

confidence: 89%

Clinical Effectiveness of Training for Awareness Resilience and Action Online Compared to Standard Treatment for Adolescents and Young Adults With Depression: Study Protocol and Analysis Plan for a Pragmatic, Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Superiority Trial

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Depression in adolescents and young adults is an increasing global health concern. Available treatments are not sufficiently effective and relapse rates remain high. The novel group-treatment program “Training for Awareness, Resilience and Action” (TARA) targets specific mechanisms based on neuroscientific findings in adolescent depression. TARA is framed within the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria and has documented feasibility and preliminary efficacy in the treatment of adolescent depression. Since neurodevelopment continues well into the mid-twenties, age-adapted treatments are warranted also for young adults. Patients 15–22 years old, with either major depressive disorder (MDD) or persistent depressive disorder (PDD) according to the DSM-IV/5 or a rating >40 on the clinician rating scale Children's Depression Rating Scale—Revised (CDRS-R), will be recruited from specialized Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and local Youth-Clinics and randomized to either TARA or standard treatment, including but not limited to antidepressant medication and/or psychotherapy. Outcome measures will be obtained before randomization (T0), after 3 months of treatment (T1) and at 6-months- (T2) and 24-months- (T3) follow-up. Additionally, dose-response measures will be obtained weekly in the TARA-arm and measures for mediation-analysis will be obtained halfway through treatment (T0.5). Primary outcome measure is Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale (RADS-2) score at T1. Secondary outcome measures include RADS-2 score at T2, Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children at T1 and T2, and CDRS-R at T1. Additional outcome measures include self-report measures of depression-associated symptoms, systemic bio-indicators of depression from blood and hair, heartrate variability, brain magnetic resonance imaging, as well as three-axial accelerometry for sleep-objectivization. Qualitative data will be gathered to reach a more comprehensive understanding of the factors affecting adolescents and young adults with depression and the extent to which the different treatments address these factors. In summary, this article describes the design, methods and statistical analysis plan for pragmatically evaluating the clinical effectiveness of TARA. This will be the first RCT to examine the effects of TARA compared to standard treatment for adolescents and young adults with MDD or PDD. We argue that this study will extend the current knowledgebase regarding the treatment of depression.NCT Registration: identifier [NCT04747340].

show abstract

Section: Self-report Xmentioning

confidence: 89%

Clinical Effectiveness of Training for Awareness Resilience and Action Online Compared to Standard Treatment for Adolescents and Young Adults With Depression: Study Protocol and Analysis Plan for a Pragmatic, Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Superiority Trial

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The MINI Kid has been found to have acceptable reliability and validity for both community and clinical samples, with comparable psychometric properties to other structured diagnostic assessments (Duncan et al, 2018) albeit with some variation across disorders (Högberg et al, 2019). The Arabic for Lebanon version 6.0 was administered, as the more recent version 7.0.2 of the MINI Kid, based on DSM-5 criteria, was not available at the time of data collection.…”

Section: The Mini Kidmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Culturally and Contextually Sensitive Assessment of Mental Health using a Structured Diagnostic Interview (MINI Kid) for Syrian Refugee Children and Adolescents in Lebanon: Challenges and Solutions

Kyrillos¹,

Bosqui²,

Moghames³

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Elevated rates of mental health difficulties are frequently reported in conflict-affected and displaced populations. Even with advances in improving the validity and reliability of measures, our knowledge of the performance of assessment tools is often limited by a lack of contextualization to specific populations and socio-political settings. This reflective paper aimed to review challenges and share lessons learned from the process of administration and supervision of a structured clinical interview, the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI Kid) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity scale, with N=119 Syrian refugee children (aged 8-17) resident in informal tented settlements in Lebanon. Qualitative data was derived from supervision process notes on challenges that arose during assessments, analyzed for thematic content. Five themes were identified: 1) practical and logistical challenges (changeable nature of daily life, competing demands, access to phones, temporary locations, limited referral options); 2) validity (lack of privacy, trust, perceptions of mental health, stigma, false positive answers); 3) cultural norms and meaning (impact of different meanings on answers); 4) contextual norms (reactive and adaptive emotional and behavioral responses to contextual stress); and 5) co-morbidity and formulation (interconnected and complex presentations). The findings suggest that while structured assessments have major advantages, cultural and contextual sensitivity during assessments, addressing practical barriers to improve accessibility, and consideration for inter-connected formulations is essential to help inform prevalence rates, treatment plans, and public health strategies.

show abstract

“…The MINI-kid is a short, standardized, structured, diagnostic interview, designed for diagnostic criteria of the DSM-IV and ICD-10 for psychiatric disorders. MINI-kid disorders have shown test-retest reliability and validity comparable to other standardized diagnostic interviews [24]. In the Mexican population, it has been validated [25].…”

Section: Clinical Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychiatric Comorbidity in Mexican Adolescents with a Diagnosis of Eating Disorders Its Relationship with the Body Mass Index

Ruíz-Ramos

Martínez‐Magaña

García

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The prevalence of comorbid psychiatric disorders among patients with eating disorders (ED) is higher than the general population. Individuals diagnosed with eating disorders have changes in their body mass index which could promote severe metabolic disruptions. This study aimed (1) to report the prevalence of comorbid psychiatric disorders among a Mexican adolescent sample diagnosed with eating disorders, (2) to compare our results with the prevalence of psychiatric disorders reported from a national survey of mental health of adolescents, (3) to compare the presence of psychiatric comorbidities between ED diagnoses, and (4) to explore the relationship of these comorbidities with the body mass index. In the study, we included 187 Mexican adolescents diagnosed with eating disorders. The psychiatric comorbidities were evaluated using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for children/adolescents, and a revised questionnaire on eating and weight patterns. We found that 89% of the Mexican adolescents diagnosed with ED had another psychiatric comorbidity. Major depressive disorder (52.40%) and suicide risk (40%) were the most prevalent comorbidities. Attention and deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) prevalence was different between ED diagnosis, and adolescents with binge-eating disorder and ADHD had the higher body mass index. Our results showed that in this sample of Mexican adolescents, the presence of comorbidities could impact body mass index. This emphasizes the importance that clinicians take into consideration the presence of psychiatric comorbidities to achieve an integrative treatment for adolescents diagnosed with ED.

show abstract

Diagnostic validity of the MINI-KID disorder classifications in specialized child and adolescent psychiatric outpatient clinics in Sweden

Cited by 27 publications

References 28 publications

Clinical Effectiveness of Training for Awareness Resilience and Action Online Compared to Standard Treatment for Adolescents and Young Adults With Depression: Study Protocol and Analysis Plan for a Pragmatic, Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Superiority Trial

Clinical Effectiveness of Training for Awareness Resilience and Action Online Compared to Standard Treatment for Adolescents and Young Adults With Depression: Study Protocol and Analysis Plan for a Pragmatic, Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Superiority Trial

The Culturally and Contextually Sensitive Assessment of Mental Health using a Structured Diagnostic Interview (MINI Kid) for Syrian Refugee Children and Adolescents in Lebanon: Challenges and Solutions

Psychiatric Comorbidity in Mexican Adolescents with a Diagnosis of Eating Disorders Its Relationship with the Body Mass Index

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About