2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic value of 3D time-of-flight MRA in trigeminal neuralgia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between peripheral blood vessels and nerves and brainstem could also be observed directly. The maximum density projection technique could also be used to realize arterial imaging to understand the origin and course of the responsible blood vessels [13]. It can provide an effective means for preoperative evaluation and screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between peripheral blood vessels and nerves and brainstem could also be observed directly. The maximum density projection technique could also be used to realize arterial imaging to understand the origin and course of the responsible blood vessels [13]. It can provide an effective means for preoperative evaluation and screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the present results, when using 3D MIF technology, the sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing NVC was able to be improved. In a previous report, the DOR and AUROC of 3D TOF MRA in diagnosing NVC were 52.92 (95% CI, 26.39-106.11) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.99), respectively ( 19 ). Compared with 3D TOF MRA, the DOR of 3D MIF technology based on 3D TOF MRA combined with HR T2WI reached 291 (95% CI, 99-853) and the AUROC was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97-0.99).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As mentioned above, 3D TOF MRA is a widely used MRI sequence for detecting NVC, which is frequently used as a standard MRI-based method to compare with other methods. In a previous meta-analysis, the authors reported that 3D TOF MRA exhibited a sensitivity of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.96) and specificity of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.66-0.86) in correctly identifying NVC in patients with TN ( 19 ). According to the present results, when using 3D MIF technology, the sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing NVC was able to be improved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed high diagnostic ability of this combination method with high sensitivity and specificity. In a meta-analysis in 2015, the authors reported that 3D TOF MRA had a sensitivity of 95% (95%CI: 0.93-0.96) and specificity of 77% (95%CI: 0.66-0.86) in identifying NVC in TN patients[ 21 ]. According to our results, when combined with HR T2WI, the specificity of 3D TOF MRA could be significantly improved in diagnosing NVC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likelihood ratio and DOR are composite indicators that can simultaneously reflect sensitivity and specificity. According to a previous report, the DOR of 3D TOF MRA in diagnosing NVC was 52.92 (95%CI: 26.39-106.11)[ 21 ]. Compared with 3D TOF MRA, combined 3D TOF MRA and HR T2WI had higher PLR and lower NLR, and its DOR reached 283 (95%CI: 50-1620).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%