2001
DOI: 10.1378/chest.119.4.1138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Value of CYFRA 21–1 Tumor Marker and CEA in Pleural Effusion Due to Mesothelioma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A large number of studies on the potential diagnostic value of pleural tumor markers have been published, which report either encouraging or disappointing results (Wobbes et al, 1992;Garcia-Pachon et al, 1997;Riantawan et al, 2000;Paganuzzi et al, 2001). The disagreement in results can be attributed to different factors, including the heterogeneity of tumor types, the appropriate inclusion of paramalignant PE to calculate test performances, the sometimes underpowered series, and the use of different methodologies and cut-off values in tumor marker assays (Porcel et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of studies on the potential diagnostic value of pleural tumor markers have been published, which report either encouraging or disappointing results (Wobbes et al, 1992;Garcia-Pachon et al, 1997;Riantawan et al, 2000;Paganuzzi et al, 2001). The disagreement in results can be attributed to different factors, including the heterogeneity of tumor types, the appropriate inclusion of paramalignant PE to calculate test performances, the sometimes underpowered series, and the use of different methodologies and cut-off values in tumor marker assays (Porcel et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because mesothelioma is a rare disease, the use of SMRP as a screening assay may also require the addition of other markers to increase specificity, for example in an asbestos-exposed population. Candidate markers include osteopontin, which was recently reported to be increased in mesothelioma patients (18 ), the absence of increased carcinoembryonic antigen (6 ), or a combination with CYFRA21-1, which could aid in differential diagnosis (19 ). A marker panel requires further studies that are currently ongoing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various cytokeratins fragments (CYFRA 21.1, tissue polypeptide antigen -TPA) and other cancer antigens (CA 15.3, CA 125 or CA 19.9) have been studied as an aid in the diagnosis of mesothelioma [19,[24][25][26][27][28][29]. Cyfra 21.1 has been shown to be useful in some studies to diagnose malignant pleural effusions [24] but no definitive cut-off value has been established.…”
Section: "Old" Candidate Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%