2021
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.717687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Value of Delayed PET/MR in Liver Metastasis in Comparison With PET/CT

Abstract: ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the value of a delayed positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) scan relative to a single positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan for liver metastasis detection.MethodsIn this study, 70 patients with solid malignancies and suspicious liver lesions undergoing 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose [(18F)FDG] PET/CT and subsequent delayed liver PET/MR scans were analyzed. The histopathological analysis and/or imaging follow-up were p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the physiologic [ 18 F]FDG activity in the liver, the quality of PET data is extremely crucial for identi cation of "hot" pathologic spots. The better PET quality of the PET-MRI system that is demonstrated in our data, which proved advantageous in around one-tenth of the current study's cases, was previously described only by Zhou et al [12], who attributed this phenomenon to later image acquisition (time from radiotracer injection). We assume this could also be related to longer PET acquisition time (2.5-3 vs 20 minute per bed position) and hence better spatial resolution, and to other technical parameters (such as 4 vs 5 detector rings), a question that remains to be explored.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Given the physiologic [ 18 F]FDG activity in the liver, the quality of PET data is extremely crucial for identi cation of "hot" pathologic spots. The better PET quality of the PET-MRI system that is demonstrated in our data, which proved advantageous in around one-tenth of the current study's cases, was previously described only by Zhou et al [12], who attributed this phenomenon to later image acquisition (time from radiotracer injection). We assume this could also be related to longer PET acquisition time (2.5-3 vs 20 minute per bed position) and hence better spatial resolution, and to other technical parameters (such as 4 vs 5 detector rings), a question that remains to be explored.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In the context of assessing malignant hepatic involvement, previous data support the bene t provided by [ 18 F]FDG PET-CT, MRI, and retrospective fusion of [ 18 F]FDG-PET and MRI [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. However, data on the use of integrated PET-MRI systems are still very limited [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because of the diverse presentation of GIST liver metastases on MRI and PET/CT, for some liver lesions with qualitative difficulties, the combination of both imaging methods can evaluate the lesions' metabolism and blood perfusion simultaneously, which may be helpful for diagnosis. PET/MR has become more widely used in recent years and has been proven to be a quite efficient diagnostic modality compared to PET/CT, MR, and CT for the diagnosis of liver metastases ( 31 , 32 ), although these literatures selected liver metastases from other common tumors and it may be equally applicable to GIST liver metastases. There were some limitations in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%