2015
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02283-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic Value of GeneChip for Detection of Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Patients with Differing Treatment Histories

Abstract: The increasing burden of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) poses an escalating threat to national TB control programs. To assist appropriate treatment for TB patients, accurate and rapid detection of drug resistance is critical. The GeneChip test is a novel molecular tool for the diagnosis of TB drug resistance. Performance-related data on GeneChip are limited, and evaluation in new and previously treated TB cases has never been performed. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of GeneChip in detecting resista… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall sensitivity, specificity, agreement rate, PPV, NPV, and kappa values were 83.1, 98.7, 93.9, 96.6, 92.9% and 0.85 for detecting M. tuberculosis RFP resistance, respectively; 79.9, 99.6, 93.1, 98.8, 91.1% and 0.84 for detecting M. tuberculosis INH resistance, respectively; and 74.1, 99.8, 93.6, 99.2, 92.4% and 0.81 for detecting MDR-TB, respectively. These results were consistent with those reported by Guo, Y. et al, Pang, Y. et al, Tang, P et al, and Zhu, L. et al [ 10 , 19 21 ]. However, compared with the MeltPro TB assay method in detection of TB drug resistance [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The overall sensitivity, specificity, agreement rate, PPV, NPV, and kappa values were 83.1, 98.7, 93.9, 96.6, 92.9% and 0.85 for detecting M. tuberculosis RFP resistance, respectively; 79.9, 99.6, 93.1, 98.8, 91.1% and 0.84 for detecting M. tuberculosis INH resistance, respectively; and 74.1, 99.8, 93.6, 99.2, 92.4% and 0.81 for detecting MDR-TB, respectively. These results were consistent with those reported by Guo, Y. et al, Pang, Y. et al, Tang, P et al, and Zhu, L. et al [ 10 , 19 21 ]. However, compared with the MeltPro TB assay method in detection of TB drug resistance [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“… 26 , 27 Therefore, the characteristics of cases should not be ignored when evaluating the performance of GeneChip. 24 , 28 In the current study, we observed that sex, age, treatment history, treatment failure outcome, and place of residence were significantly associated with the diagnostic value of GeneChip.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“… 21 Another study in China reported that GeneChip performed better in newly treated cases in detecting RIF resistance, INH resistance, and MDR-TB. 24 However, few studies have evaluated the performance of GeneChip in subgroups of patients with different characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ma et al (82) developed and evaluated a solid-phase chip for the simultaneous detection of 15 types of bacteria directly from respiratory tract specimens of patients with pneumonia, thus reducing detection time, facilitating the early administration of antimicrobial drugs and preventing bacterial resistance caused by empirical antibiotic treatment. Recent studies have shown that the CapitalBio DNA chip (CapitalBio Corporation) can detect the resistance of MTB to rifampicin and isoniazid, and the corresponding gene mutations within 6 h, which is quicker and more accurate than traditional bacterial culture and drug susceptibility tests (83)(84)(85). Currently, a number of automatic detection platforms based on solid-phase chips are entering the market.…”
Section: Gene Chip Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%