Objective
The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of bedside lung ultrasound (LUS) and LUS scores in the evaluating and grading of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS).
Methods
We performed a prospective study on 80 children with suspected NRDS. Infants with a PaO2‐to‐FiO2 ratio of <200, 200–300, and >300 mmHg were categorized as the “severe‐NRDS group,” “mild‐NRDS group,” and “non‐NRDS group,” respectively. Left and right lungs were divided into six areas, respectively. For each lung area, a 0‐ to 3‐point score was given.
Results
The most common ultrasonic signs of NRDS include bilateral coalescent B‐lines, thickened pleural line, and white lung without spared areas. Moreover, different LUS scores among non‐NRDS, mild‐NRDS, and severe‐NRDS groups were identified (6.00 ± 4.033, 25.82 ± 3.778 and 27.90 ± 4.071, respectively; P < .05). When the cutoff value of LUS score was selected as 13 for the differentiation of non‐NRDS from NRDS, the sensitivity and specificity were 96.9% and 93.3%, respectively, and the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) was 0.938 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84–1.00). With a cutoff value of 26.5 for the differentiation between mild‐ and severe‐ARDS, the AUC of ROC curve of the LUS score was 0.707 (95% CI, 0.58–0.83). Similar results were revealed as those with chest X‐ray.
Conclusion
This study showed that LUS and LUS scores complement each other, and are highly reliable and efficient in bedside radiological diagnostic investigations in newborns with NRDS.