Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging Scanning in Different Types of Early Prostate Cancer

Abstract

To investigate the cost of MRI-sensitive imaging (SWI) for early-stage prostate cancer. In 2019, the research group included a total of 60 leukemia patients, all of whom were diagnosed with prostate-specific antigen (PSA). According to the range of PSA values, they were group A (18 cases), group A 0-44 mg/ml (18 cases), and group B 4-1010 mg/ml (26 cases). 10 mg/ml was divided into C group (16 cases). Another 60 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia treated at the same time served as a control group. All patients underwent sensitive MRI scanning, followed by diagnostic and clinical evaluation of weighted MRI scanning to diagnose various types of prostate cancer. The results showed that there was no difference in Ve levels among the three groups ( P > 0.05 ); the SUSE score and Ktrans and Kep levels of the patients in group C were higher in groups B, A, and A ( P < 0.05 ). In patients with early leukemia, SUSE score was significantly correlated with Ktrans and Kep levels ( P < 0.05 ), but not with Ve and P > 0.05 levels. Magnetic resonance imaging can be used to diagnose prostate cancer. It can differentiate and diagnose different types of prostate cancer early. This is important for evaluating the benefits of prostate cancer screening and treatment.

Retracted: Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging Scanning in Different Types of Early Prostate Cancer

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”