2023
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1095101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic value of plasma RNF180 gene methylation for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: ObjectiveA systematic evaluation of the diagnostic value of Ring finger protein 180 (RNF180) gene methylation as a novel tumor marker for gastric cancer (GC) is required to improve the early diagnosis of gastric cancer patients.MethodsComputer searches of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data, National Research Register, Cclinical Controlled Trials, Opengrey and VIP databases were conducted from the database’s inception to September 1, 2022. Two researchers independently… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, how to select the most appropriate specimens for testing (for example, blood samples), and are there advantages of this approach over traditional diagnostic methods such as pathology and imaging [ 72 ]? Furthermore, can WDHD1 be widely used in clinical applications like the current commonly used cancer biomarkers such as CA199 and CA125 [ 73 ]? Finally, since we only explored the diagnostic value of WDHD1 mRNA, what would be the diagnostic value of evaluating its protein level using proteomics technology [ 74 ]?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, how to select the most appropriate specimens for testing (for example, blood samples), and are there advantages of this approach over traditional diagnostic methods such as pathology and imaging [ 72 ]? Furthermore, can WDHD1 be widely used in clinical applications like the current commonly used cancer biomarkers such as CA199 and CA125 [ 73 ]? Finally, since we only explored the diagnostic value of WDHD1 mRNA, what would be the diagnostic value of evaluating its protein level using proteomics technology [ 74 ]?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%