2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.02.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostic value of Status Epilepticus Severity Score for survival conditions of patients with status epilepticus: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Wang et al reported the results of a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of STESS for survival [25]. A total of 11 studies including 12 observations with 1356 patients were included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Wang et al reported the results of a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of STESS for survival [25]. A total of 11 studies including 12 observations with 1356 patients were included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS) (6) was the first widely used prognostic tool for SE. Its performance was recently assessed in a systematic review of Wang et al (7): a pooled area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.81 was reported for mortality. A sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 53% were reached with the cutoff point of ≥ 3 (STESS-3).…”
Section: Introduction Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, half of the patients obtained a STESS <3, a score validated to predict in-hospital mortality of SE. 32 The majority of them could be regarded as individuals with a low probability of in-hospital death. In addition, AED suspension, the most common etiology in our study, is associated with low mortality.…”
Section: Stess and Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 99%