2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.phpro.2012.10.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diagnostics, Modeling and Simulation: Three Keys Towards Mastering the Cutting Process with Fiber, Disk and Diode Lasers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, approaches transforming the physics involved into a free boundary problem were developed, making the problem computationally efficiently solvable [171,190,201]. Only very few models, however, were developed or applied onto the relatively new processes remote fusion cutting (RFC) and remote ablation cutting (RAC), mainly investigating the role of the vapor pressure, the processes' main driving force [121,156,178].…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, approaches transforming the physics involved into a free boundary problem were developed, making the problem computationally efficiently solvable [171,190,201]. Only very few models, however, were developed or applied onto the relatively new processes remote fusion cutting (RFC) and remote ablation cutting (RAC), mainly investigating the role of the vapor pressure, the processes' main driving force [121,156,178].…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption is supported by Petring et al [6,7] who estimate the surface temperature of the cut front to be highest near the bottom. This is in strong agreement with the experiments of Onuseit et al [8,9] who measured line emissions of iron emitted from the surface of the cut front for the CO 2 laser cutting process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Fiber and disk lasers belong to the first generation of successful implementations and motivated important research questions in several domains. Among these research questions, understanding the reason for the severe differences in cutting performance, as compared to the established CO2 laser sources, became the most investigated topic: Mahrle and Beyer (2009) were the first to prove that these differences are related to changes in the absorption behavior in the cut front and proposed a simple two-dimensional model of the cut front to support it; Hirano and Fabbro (2012) used high-speed imaging of the cut front to support a claim about instabilities of the melt flow in the cut kerf generated by the different absorption behavior; Petring, Molitor et al (2012) used advanced modelling tools to demonstrate that in the cut kerf the multiple reflections are different and can be responsible for such instabilities. More recently, researchers are focusing not only in understanding the problem but also on strategies to solve it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%