The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology 2020
DOI: 10.1002/9781118786093.iela0095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dialect: Age

Abstract: Age is a widely used variable in linguistic research, and is usually treated as a simple chronological measure of time since birth. However, upon closer examination age turns out to be a much more complex variable than that, because two individuals with the same chronological age are very likely to have experienced events affecting their use of language differently, even if they are otherwise matched for social factors. In addition, long‐standing assumptions about the stability of linguistic production across … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Critically, then, exposure does matter insomuch that it appears that primed variants must be in a speaker's repertoire to affect their production (a constraint of repertoire ), and that, for some of these phonological variables, inclusion in a speaker's repertoire is only coming through long-term second dialect exposure. The fact that shifting is easier where there is already internal variability mirrors arguments in second dialect acquisition that acquisition is easier where there is existing flexibility on a variable (i.e., Bowie, 2000; Sankoff & Blondeau, 2007) and in accommodation tasks, where more convergence is observed when there is already variability in a speaker's production of a variant (e.g., Walker & Campbell-Kibler, 2015:14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Critically, then, exposure does matter insomuch that it appears that primed variants must be in a speaker's repertoire to affect their production (a constraint of repertoire ), and that, for some of these phonological variables, inclusion in a speaker's repertoire is only coming through long-term second dialect exposure. The fact that shifting is easier where there is already internal variability mirrors arguments in second dialect acquisition that acquisition is easier where there is existing flexibility on a variable (i.e., Bowie, 2000; Sankoff & Blondeau, 2007) and in accommodation tasks, where more convergence is observed when there is already variability in a speaker's production of a variant (e.g., Walker & Campbell-Kibler, 2015:14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Mobility has been shown for several languages to influence language change, including in theoretical work (e.g. [3,9,11]) and in studies on different linguistic levels [1,2,5,6,8]. In terms of the speakers' biographical data used for establishing its effects, however, these studies were less complex.…”
Section: Lmi As a Useful Approach For Language Variation And Change S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous dialectological and sociolinguistic studies have researched mobility and exposure to contact in relation to different linguistic aspects (e.g. [1][2][3][5][6][7][8][9]). David Britain's extensive research on the topic underscores the crucial influence of mobility on dialectal variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations