Dialect Polysemia as a Source of Interpretation of Language Signs

Abstract

The article is devoted to the linguistic analysis of the archaic vocabulary of the Ossetian language compared with its dialect forms in order to identify similar semantic characteristics and differential features of morphogenesis. Stepby-step analysis of synonymous pairs of dialect variants identified lexical groups with relatively frozen semantics, established various borrowing paths and forms of metaphoric transformation as main differential features, characterized forms and methods of metaphorization and identified their potential participation in formation of semantic fields. Ways of semantic integration and actualization of dialect forms with preservation of other variants are features of modern dialect synonyms functioning in one language. The importance of synchronous development of both dialect forms and derivational processes was emphasized.

Prefixation In The Ossetian Language: Result Of Context Interaction Of Linguistic Units

“…However, not all similarly formed words are able to maintain their original semantics, since as they are older than their formation, they change the degree of solidity (unity) of the meaning and tend to form their own meaning while preserving the semantic echoes of each of the components of a word (Morgoeva & Tsallagova, 2019). They also undergo phonetic changes, but mainly in their second part when truncating part of the original component or when forming grammatical forms.…”

Neologization Of Management Activity Lexis In The Modern Ossetic Language During Covid-19

“…The current status of speech culture both Russian and Ossetian https: //doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.12.04.32 Corresponding Author: Larisa Gatsalova Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the Organizing Committee of the conference eISSN: 2357-1330 273 languages are determined by several mutually dependent factors, primarily extralinguistic since language is a socio-cultural code that reflects the state of society and its world picture. This picture is most clearly projected by the vocabulary is the most mobile language structure (Ilyin & Sidorova, 2019;Ilyin & Solomka, 2018;Isaeva & Isaev, 2010;Morgoeva & Tsallagova, 2019;Tsopanova et al, 2019). The identification of language use and its frequency indirectly, but accurately shows us the whole picture of social, cultural, economic, and political changes currently taking place in a particular society (Gatsalova & Parsieva, 2015).…”