Dialectic Tensions in the Financial Markets: A Longitudinal Study of pre- and Post-Crisis Regulatory Technology

Abstract

This article presents the findings from a longitudinal research study on regulatory technology in the UK financial services industry. The financial crisis with serious corporate and mutual fund scandals raised the profile of compliance as governmental bodies, institutional and private investors introduced a ‘ tsunami’ of financial regulations. Adopting a multi-level analysis, this study examines how regulatory technology was used by financial firms to meet their compliance obligations, pre- and post-crisis. Empirical data collected over 12 years examine the deployment of an investment management system in eight financial firms. Interviews with public regulatory bodies, financial institutions and technology providers reveal a culture of compliance with increased transparency, surveillance and accountability. Findings show that dialectic tensions arise as the pursuit of transparency, surveillance and accountability in compliance mandates is simultaneously rationalized, facilitated and obscured by regulatory technology. Responding to these challenges, regulatory bodies continue to impose revised compliance mandates on financial firms to force them to adapt their financial technologies in an ever-changing multi-jurisdictional regulatory landscape.

Making the world a better place with fintech research

“…This research can be especially relevant for conceptualising, developing and evaluating digital tools that fully account for the contextual conditions of poor communities at the receiving end of fintech innovations. Third, research on the business environment of fintech highlights the work of users of fintech services such as peer-to-peer lending (Jiang et al, 2018;Riggins & Weber, 2017;Xu & Chau, 2018) and explores the environmental drivers that support fintech innovations-for example, through the monitoring of algorithmic trading (Cooper et al, 2017), the use of regulatory technology (or 'regtech') in financial markets (Currie et al, 2018) and an effective regulation of mobile payments (Liu et al, 2015). Ryu & Kim, 2018).…”

Meta-View of Blockchain Technology Tensions in Organizational Implementation and Use

“…Eventually, the accountability model was identified as a further area of tension in the IS literature [48,49]. The accountability model is strongly linked to compliance aspects in the organization, as the accountability model is responsible for whether a company allows strong transparency of logged records and responsibilities on the blockchain or anonymity resp.…”

A review of FinTech research

“…Karakas and Stamegna (2018) describe European efforts to create a regulatory framework capable of balancing regulators' support for FinTech innovation with consumer protection and financial stabilisation in order to maintain Europe's advantages in the field of finance. Currie et al (2018), in a study on regulatory technology in the UK financial services industry, show that regulatory technology is essential to meet the regulatory obligations that regulators and investors desire.…”