2023
DOI: 10.5195/dpj.2023.482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dialogic teacher inquiry: The case of a preservice teacher learning to facilitate class discussion

Abstract: Developing knowledge and practice for high-quality K-12 class discussion remains challenging, especially for new teachers juggling other classroom responsibilities. Our study reports the case of a preservice teacher learning to lead discussions while enrolled in a teacher education inquiry course, simultaneous with semester-long supervised practice teaching in a seventh-grade class (12-13-year-olds) in a high-poverty urban community. The work is guided by a complex teacher learning process for developing compl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(For all resources and PSTs' analytic processes, see Patterson Using a multicase study approach anchored by a central topic (Stake, 2006), the TE course featured collective inquiry. This enables PSTs to develop repertoires of knowledge and practices by collectively documenting cross-class patterns of student engagement, raising questions about the relevance of research studies and pedagogical tools, and engaging in sustained dialogue (Sanchez & Athanases, 2023). PSTs constructed joint exploration, developing methods and analyzing data together around common goals and questions.…”
Section: Study Context and Pedagogical Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(For all resources and PSTs' analytic processes, see Patterson Using a multicase study approach anchored by a central topic (Stake, 2006), the TE course featured collective inquiry. This enables PSTs to develop repertoires of knowledge and practices by collectively documenting cross-class patterns of student engagement, raising questions about the relevance of research studies and pedagogical tools, and engaging in sustained dialogue (Sanchez & Athanases, 2023). PSTs constructed joint exploration, developing methods and analyzing data together around common goals and questions.…”
Section: Study Context and Pedagogical Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, literary response moved from codified interpretations toward the complexity of multiple perspectives, aired within discussion spaces to develop and use theories to talk about emerging and complex ideas (Appleman, 2014; Beach & Swiss, 2010). The role of discussion facilitator gained complexity: not guiding students toward correct answers, but supporting exploration of tentative meanings and refining interpretations (Athanases, 1993; Sanchez & Athanases, 2023). Informed by such conceptions of literature response, a PST may need to attend carefully to what sense students make of text and how their interpretations and understanding are bolstered by peer discussion.…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%