Dialogical Participatory Action Research in Social Work Using Delta-Reflecting Teams

Olsson, Ann-Margreth E.

doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-803-9_14

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The concepts of dialogue, dialogicality/dialogism, and dialogical practices have been used in various Scandinavian and international research contexts within psychology, sociology, and anthropology to explore phenomena including teaching, research, and social work as dialogical processes (Olsson, 2014), and pedagogy and activity theory as dialogical fields (Roth, 2013). In this chapter, we draw on an understanding of dialogical practice as a form of practice involving dialogues that facilitate and encourage sharing and creating connections across positions and/or parties that usually have different (sometimes opposing) perspectives (Mørck et al, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gangs in the Era of Internet and Social Media

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%