Virtual Learning Environments
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-0011-9.ch706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dialogues and Perception of Intersubjectivity in a Small Group

Abstract: The core value of Web 2.0 lies in its potential for building technologies that are open, decentralized, and shared. This paper designs group activity to facilitate knowledge building and move on learning management system to web 2.0 paradigms with computer supported collaborative learning in a small group. The “give-take” metaphor for knowledge construction in a small group discourse only interprets the solo voice phenomenon in asynchronous forums. Tumultuous, parallel, and connected voices in synchronous conf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I interpreted this kind of metacognitive talk as one possible result of the "locational constraint" (Otheguy et al, 2015, p. 259), that is, a behaviour which was determined by the context of the think-aloud activity (and the whole research). As a result of the presence of the educational context, most participants indirectly positioned themselves towards the researcher in a talking-listening space characteristic to the intersubjective situations of learning activities (Lin, Chen, & Chen, 2012) in which teachers are providers of information. One such example of positioning is found in Excerpt (23), where the participant could not come up with the L1 Hungarian word to name a thing in the picture and addressed the researcher in an attempt to get assistance.…”
Section: Justifying the Adoption Of Different Pathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I interpreted this kind of metacognitive talk as one possible result of the "locational constraint" (Otheguy et al, 2015, p. 259), that is, a behaviour which was determined by the context of the think-aloud activity (and the whole research). As a result of the presence of the educational context, most participants indirectly positioned themselves towards the researcher in a talking-listening space characteristic to the intersubjective situations of learning activities (Lin, Chen, & Chen, 2012) in which teachers are providers of information. One such example of positioning is found in Excerpt (23), where the participant could not come up with the L1 Hungarian word to name a thing in the picture and addressed the researcher in an attempt to get assistance.…”
Section: Justifying the Adoption Of Different Pathsmentioning
confidence: 99%