2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diameter-dependent assessment of microvascular leakage following ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier opening

Sharon Katz,
Roni Gattegno,
Lea Peko
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a notably large parameter space that impacts blood-brain barrier opening, including the sonication parameters (frequency, pressure, pulse length, pulse repetition frequency, exposure duration) (McDannold et al 2008, Chopra et al 2010, Choi et al 2011, contrast agent (agent type, dose, and size distribution) (McDannold et al 2007, Samiotaki et al 2012, McMahon and Hynynen 2017, Bing et al 2018, and anesthesia administration (Itani andMattrey 2011, McDannold et al 2017). The approach is further complicated by interand intra-subject biological variability in skull transmission efficiency (Fry andBarger 1978, Pichardo et al 2011) and local target vasculature (density, diameter, flow rate) (Sassaroli and Hynynen 2005, McDannold et al 2012, Nhan et al 2013, Hosseinkhah et al 2015, Poon et al 2021, Katz et al 2023. In this study, the ultrasound parameters and microbubble dose were not varied, but were in range of previous blood-brain barrier opening preclinical studies (Baseri et al 2010, Bing et al 2018, Kovacs et al 2018, Meng et al 2019, Poon et al 2021.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…There is a notably large parameter space that impacts blood-brain barrier opening, including the sonication parameters (frequency, pressure, pulse length, pulse repetition frequency, exposure duration) (McDannold et al 2008, Chopra et al 2010, Choi et al 2011, contrast agent (agent type, dose, and size distribution) (McDannold et al 2007, Samiotaki et al 2012, McMahon and Hynynen 2017, Bing et al 2018, and anesthesia administration (Itani andMattrey 2011, McDannold et al 2017). The approach is further complicated by interand intra-subject biological variability in skull transmission efficiency (Fry andBarger 1978, Pichardo et al 2011) and local target vasculature (density, diameter, flow rate) (Sassaroli and Hynynen 2005, McDannold et al 2012, Nhan et al 2013, Hosseinkhah et al 2015, Poon et al 2021, Katz et al 2023. In this study, the ultrasound parameters and microbubble dose were not varied, but were in range of previous blood-brain barrier opening preclinical studies (Baseri et al 2010, Bing et al 2018, Kovacs et al 2018, Meng et al 2019, Poon et al 2021.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…S1). Therefore, we chose parameters that were previously used 8 : A distance of 2 pixels (0.58 μm width) from the vessel wall and a perivascular area extending 10 pixels (2.93 μm width(. An analysis of 4,500 blood vessels from the NB group, 2,877 from the MB group, and 3,403 from the control group was conducted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BBBD was induced in the treated groups through retro orbital injection of bubbles. The MB treatment group received 2 x 107 MBs in 50 µl of degassed PBS, following a protocol from previous work 8 . The NB treatment group was injected with 0.737 µl to 1 g of animal weight, diluted in a degassed PBS in a1:1 ratio, as described in other works29,43.…”
Section: In-vivo Bbbd Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These phantoms may provide an alternative to computerized flow simulations used to evaluate localization and tracking accuracy by creating shapes that are challenging to reproduce with ULM, such as the horseshoe shape . We believe these phantoms can be used to study a wide variety of applicationssuch as the verification of contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging, resolution-improving ultrasound algorithms, and the behavior of bubble flow in therapeutic applications. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%