2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.09.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm and outcome of endovascular aneurysm repair: does size matter? A report from EUROSTAR

Abstract: The midterm outcome of large aneurysms after EVAR was associated with increased rates of aneurysm-related death, unrelated death, and rupture. Reports of EVAR should stratify their outcomes according to the diameter of the aneurysm. Large aneurysms need a more rigorous post-EVAR surveillance schedule than do smaller aneurysms. In small aneurysms EVAR was associated with excellent outcome. This finding may justify reappraisal of currently accepted management strategies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
226
2
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(251 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
18
226
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Modification of devices must have reduced late sac enlargement. Although 10% of LSE at 3 years in the present study is similar with 8%-10% in other studies, 13,15,16) such proportion is steadily increased from 1 year up to 5 years after EVAR. On the other hand, incidence of sac shrinkage at 3 and 5 years were 59.2% and 61.7% respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Modification of devices must have reduced late sac enlargement. Although 10% of LSE at 3 years in the present study is similar with 8%-10% in other studies, 13,15,16) such proportion is steadily increased from 1 year up to 5 years after EVAR. On the other hand, incidence of sac shrinkage at 3 and 5 years were 59.2% and 61.7% respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…17,18) Persistent type II endoleak is often treated by coil embolization once the aneurysmal sac is expanded. 15,19,20,21) However, eradicating all channels of blood supply to the sac is sometimes difficult because this procedure requires access to the inflow vessels, and to the communicating vessels to inflow ones, as well as the outflow vessels. 22) In such cases, surgical conversion is required if the aneurysmal sac is further enlarged, despite repeated coil embolization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from the EUROSTAR Register (n = 4400) has shown that an aneurysm diameter greater than 6.5 cm results in a significantly increased perioperative risk and an increased rate of type I endoleaks [33]. Therefore, aneurysm diameters of 6.5 cm to 7.0 cm are a relative contraindication.…”
Section: Aneurysm Sacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in our experience, only 8% of sequentially imaged post-EVAR patients demonstrated sac enlargement at 3 years. 1 In the Eurostar registry, the corresponding number is in the 10% range, 5,11 and in device-specific trials (in which inclusion criteria mandate adherence to specific instructions for use [IFU]), the rate of sac enlargement ranged from 5% to 12%. 4,7 Indeed, the significance (or, more properly stated, the lack thereof) of AAA sac diameter increase after EVAR has been doubted by some investigators as a result of poor correlation with clinically relevant outcomes.…”
Section: Article See P 2848mentioning
confidence: 99%