Diamond Sensors for Energy Frontier Experiments

Schnetzer, S.; Cristinziani, M.; Gonella, L.; Huegging, F.; Janssen, J.; Obermann, T.; Wermes, N.; Bellini, Vincenzo; Costa, S.; Potenza, R.; Sutera, C.; Tuvé, C.; Bartosik, M.; Červ, M.; Dąbrowski, A.; Dehning, B.; Dobos, D.; Gallrapp, C.; Gastal, M.; Jansen, H.; Kurfuerst, C; Pernegger, H.; Roe, S.; Sfyrla, A.; Weilhammer, P.; Weiß, C.; Wengler, T.; Frais-Kölbl, H.; Schreiner, Thomas; Bruzzi, M.; D’Alessandro, R.; Lagomarsino, S.; Parrini, G.; Sciortino, S.; Kwan, S.; Uplegger, L.; Berdermann, E.; Kiš, M.; Traeger, M.; Еремин, В. В.; Brom, J. M.; Claus, G.; Dulinski, W.; Goffe, M.; Hosslet, J.; Maazouzi, C.; Mathieu, C.; Golubev, A. V.; Grigoriev, E.; Kuleshov, S.; Shimchuk, G. G.; Cindro, V.; Gorišek, A.; Kramberger, G.; Mandić, I.; Mikuž, M.; Zavrtanik, M.; Boer, W. De; Guthoff, M.; Bergonzo, P.; Caylar, B.; Pomorski, M.; Tromson, D.; Belyaev, V.; Gan, K. K.; Kagan, H.; Kass, R.; Merritt, H.; Moss, J.; Phan, S.; Smith, Scott; Hidas, D.; Stone, R.; Forneris, J.; Giudice, A. Lo; Olivero, P.; Picollo, F.; Re, Alessandro; Vittone, E.; Chau, Chien Fat; McGoldrick, G.; Venturi, N.; Trischuk, W.; Fisher-Levine, Merlin; Goldstein, Jonathan T.; Velthuis, J. J.; Oakham, Gerald; Chren, D.; Sopko, B.; Cumalat, J. P.; Stenson, K.; Wagner, Stephen; Artuso, M.; Borgia, Andrea; Garofoli, J.; Mountain, R.; Wang, J. C.; Hoeferkamp, M. R.; Seidel, S. C.; Wang, R.; Haughton, I.; Lin, Lie; Oh, A.; Tyzhnevyi, V.; Whitehead, David; Graber, Lukas; Große-Knetter, J.; Quadt, A.; Weingarten, J.; Bachmair, F.; Bäni, L.; Hits, D.; Wallny, R.; Eusebi, R.; Spanier, S.; Chiodini, G.; Perrino, R.; Spagnolo, S.

doi:10.22323/1.198.0029

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the contrary, the pulse height distributions of the poly-crystalline sample (sample #2) lie on top of each other indicating no such dependence on the incoming particle flux. The flux dependences of the single-crystal CVD diamond detectors coincide with the behavior of the diamond pixel detectors of similar type used in the PLT pilot run [9].…”

Section: Pad Detector Resultssupporting

confidence: 55%

“…During the PLT run the diamond sensor received on the order of ∼5×10 13 n/cm 2 and ∼5×10 13 charged particles/cm 2 . Figure 10 shows a similar decrease of the pulse height (∼50%) as observed in the PLT detector [9]. It is worth noting -9 - that already at a flux of 1 MHz/cm 2 the pulse height is close to the minimum, therefore implying that this particle flux was sufficient to study the effect of the decreasing pulse height using the slower pad electronics.…”

Section: Jinst 10 C07009supporting

confidence: 62%

“…The total integrated particle fluence received by the PLT sensors during the entire run was estimated by a FLUKA [6,7] calculation to be ∼5×10 13 n/cm 2 and ∼5×10 13 charged hadrons/cm 2 [8], a relatively low fluence. In early running, after receiving a relatively low fluence of ∼1×10 13 hadrons/cm 2 , the PLT sensors exhibited a pulse height dependence on particle flux with the observed pulse height decreasing with increasing particle flux [9]. The pulse heights at low rate (100 Hz) had similar values to those predicted by the damage curve derived from RD42 beam test data, while those at higher rate (4 MHz) had 1/4 of the predicted pulse height from the RD42 beam test data.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Beam test results of the dependence of signal size on incident particle flux in diamond pixel and pad detectors

Wallny

2015

J. Inst.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present results of beam tests of charged particle detectors based on single-crystal and poly-crystalline Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) diamond. We measured the signal pulse height dependence on the particle flux. The detectors were tested over a range of particle fluxes from 2 kHz/cm2 to 20 MHz/cm2. The pulse height of the sensors was measured with pad and pixel readout electronics. The pulse height of the non-irradiated single-crystal CVD diamond pad sensors was stable with respect to flux, while the pulse height of irradiated single-crystal CVD diamond pad sensors decreased with increasing particle flux. The pulse height of the non-irradiated single-crystal CVD diamond pixel detectors decreased slightly with increasing particle flux while the pulse height of the irradiated single-crystal CVD diamond pixel detectors decreased significantly with increasing particle flux. The observed sensitivity to flux is similar in both the diamond pad sensors constructed using diamonds from the Pixel Luminosity Telescope (PLT) irradiated during its pilot run in the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) detector and in neutron irradiated diamond pad sensors from the same manufacturer irradiated to the same fluence of neutrons. The pulse height for irradiated poly-crystalline CVD diamond pad sensors proved to be stable with respect to particle flux.

show abstract

Section: Pad Detector Resultssupporting

confidence: 55%

Section: Jinst 10 C07009supporting

confidence: 62%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Beam test results of the dependence of signal size on incident particle flux in diamond pixel and pad detectors

Wallny

2015

J. Inst.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The study pulse height dependence in the CVD diamond sensors on the particle flux was prompted by the experience [7] in the pilot run of the Pixel Luminosity Telescope (PLT) [8]. For our study the πM1 beam line of the High Intensity Proton Accelerator (HIPA) at Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) was chosen.…”

Section: Pulse Height Vs Rate Study Of Pcvd Pad Detectors At Psimentioning

confidence: 99%

Recent Results from Beam Tests of 3D and Pad pCVD Diamond Detectors

Wallny¹

2017

Proceedings of 38th International Conference on High Energy Physics — PoS(ICHEP2016)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Results from prototypes of a detector using chemical vapor deposited (CVD) diamond with embedded resistive electrodes in the bulk forming a 3D diamond device are presented. A detector system consisting of 3D devices based on poly-crystalline CVD (pCVD) diamond was connected to a multi-channel readout and successfully tested in a 120 GeV/c proton beam at CERN proving for the first time the feasibility of the 3D detector concept in pCVD for particle tracking applications. We also present beam test results on the dependence of signal size on incident particle rate in charged particle detectors based on poly-crystalline CVD diamond. The detectors were tested in a 260 MeV/c pion beam over a range of particle fluxes from 2 kHz/cm 2 to 10 MHz/cm 2 . The pulse height of the sensors was measured with pad readout electronics at a peaking time of 7 ns. Our data from the 2015 beam tests at PSI indicate that the pulse height of poly-crystalline CVD diamond sensor irradiated to 5 × 10 14 n eq /cm 2 is independent of particle flux at 3% level.

show abstract

Diamond sensors for future high energy experiments

Bachmair

2016

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A:

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Diamond Sensors for Energy Frontier Experiments

Cited by 3 publications

References 8 publications

Beam test results of the dependence of signal size on incident particle flux in diamond pixel and pad detectors

Beam test results of the dependence of signal size on incident particle flux in diamond pixel and pad detectors

Recent Results from Beam Tests of 3D and Pad pCVD Diamond Detectors

Diamond sensors for future high energy experiments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About