Diaporthe kyushuensis sp. nov., the teleomorph of the causal fungus of grapevine swelling arm in Japan, and its anamorph Phomopsis vitimegaspora

Kajitani, Y.; Kanematsu, Satoko

doi:10.1007/bf02464318

Cited by 14 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…References: Kuo and Leu 1998;Kajitani and Kanematsu 2000 Diaporthe australafricana Crous and van Niekerk (2005) Disease and host: Associated with diseases of grapevines Distribution: Australia, South Africa Notes: This distinct species has been described in the latest reassessment of species of Phomopsis of grapevines for Australian and south African isolates as more or less resembling D. viticola (van Niekerk et al 2005). Therefore the name D. australafricana is proposed for the Australian isolates formally treated as D. perjuncta or D. viticola.…”

Section: Names Of Common Phytopathogens In Current Usementioning

confidence: 95%

“…For instance, Phomopsis vitimegaspora Kuo & Leu associated with dead arm disease of grapevines in Taiwan was identified by Kuo and Liu (1998). The teleomorph was later recognized from Kyushu, Japan and designated the name Diaporthe kyusuensis Kajitani & Kanematsu with ITS sequence similarities (Kajitani and Kanematsu 2000). Thus the same species has two completely different names.…”

Section: Nomenclatural Historymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The genus Phomopsis: biology, applications, species concepts and names of common phytopathogens

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The genus Phomopsis (teleomorph Diaporthe) comprises phytopathologically important microfungi with diverse host associations and a worldwide distribution. Species concepts in Phomopsis have been based historically on morphology, cultural characteristics and host affiliation. This paper serves to provide an overview of the current status of the taxonomy in Phomopsis with special reference to biology, applications of various species, species concepts, future research perspectives and names of common pathogens, the latter being given taxonomic reappraisal. Accurate species identification is critical to understanding disease epidemiology and in developing effective control measures for plant diseases. Difficulties in accurate species identification using morphology have led to the application of alternative approaches to differentiate species, including virulence and pathogenicity, biochemistry, metabolites, physiology, antagonism, molecular phylogenetics and mating experiments. Redefinition of Phomopsis/Diaporthe species has been ongoing, and some species have been redefined based on a combination of molecular, morphological, cultural, phytopathological and mating type data. Rapid progress in molecular identification has in particular revolutionized taxonomic studies, providing persuasive genetic evidence to define the species boundaries. A backbone ITS based phylogenetic tree is here in generated using the sequences derived from 46 type, epitype cultures, and vouchers and is presented as a rough and quick identification guide for species of Phomopsis. The need for epitypification of taxonomic entities and the need to use multiple loci in phylogenies that better reflect species limits are suggested. The account of names of phytopathogens currently in use are listed alphabetically and annotated with a taxonomic entry, teleomorph, associated hosts and disease symptoms, including brief summaries of taxonomic and phylogenetic research. Available type culture information and details of gene sequences derived from type cultures are also summarized and tabulated.

show abstract

Section: Names Of Common Phytopathogens In Current Usementioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Nomenclatural Historymentioning

confidence: 99%

The genus Phomopsis: biology, applications, species concepts and names of common phytopathogens

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Recently, Úrbez-Torres et al (2013) provided strong evidence for the role of P. viticola as a canker-causing organism, and suggested its addition to the fungi involved in the grapevine trunk diseases complex. Moreover, D. ampelina is the causal agent of grapevine swelling arm, induced also by D. kyushuensis (as P. vitimegaspora ) ( Kajitani & Kanematsu 2000 , Van Niekerk et al 2005 ). Cane bleaching is another grapevine symptom caused by D. perjuncta and D. ampelina ( Kuo & Leu 1998 , Kajitani & Kanematsu 2000 , Mostert et al 2001a , Rawnsley et al 2004 , Van Niekerk et al 2005 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diaporthe diversity and pathogenicity revealed from a broad survey of grapevine diseases in Europe

Guarnaccia¹,

Groenewald²,

Woodhall³

et al. 2018

persoonia

126

133

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Species of Diaporthe are considered important plant pathogens, saprobes, and endophytes on a wide range of plant hosts. Several species are well-known on grapevines, either as agents of pre- or post-harvest infections, including Phomopsis cane and leaf spot, cane bleaching, swelling arm and trunk cankers. In this study we explore the occurrence, diversity and pathogenicity of Diaporthe spp. associated with Vitis vinifera in major grape production areas of Europe and Israel, focusing on nurseries and vineyards. Surveys were conducted in Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Spain and the UK. A total of 175 Diaporthe strains were isolated from asymptomatic and symptomatic shoots, branches and trunks. A multi-locus phylogeny was established based on five genomic loci (ITS, tef1, cal, his3 and tub2), and the morphological characters of the isolates were determined. Preliminary pathogenicity tests were performed on green grapevine shoots with representative isolates. The most commonly isolated species were D. eres and D. ampelina. Four new Diaporthe species described here as D. bohemiae, D. celeris, D. hispaniae and D. hungariae were found associated with affected vines. Pathogenicity tests revealed D. baccae, D. celeris, D. hispaniae and D. hungariae as pathogens of grapevines. No symptoms were caused by D. bohemiae. This study represents the first report of D. ambigua and D. baccae on grapevines in Europe. The present study improves our understanding of the species associated with several disease symptoms on V. vinifera plants, and provides useful information for effective disease management.

show abstract

“…on lingonberry (Farr et al 2002b). Recent studies suggest that many species of Phomopsis occur on a variety of plant host genera (Rehner and Uecker 1994) or, conversely, the same plant host may harbor several species of Phomopsis as exemplifi ed by the six different species of Diaporthe-Phomopsis on Vitis vinifera (Phillips 1999;Kajitani and Kanematsu 2000;Mostert et al 2001;van Niekerk et al 2005).…”

Section: Diaporthaceaementioning

confidence: 97%

A review of the phylogeny and biology of the Diaporthales

2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Diaporthe kyushuensis sp. nov., the teleomorph of the causal fungus of grapevine swelling arm in Japan, and its anamorph Phomopsis vitimegaspora

Abstract: Diaporthe kyushuensis sp. nov. is described and named as the teleomorph of causal fungus of grapevine swelling arm. The anamorph of the fungus is Phomopsis vitimegaspora.In the 1960s, a new canker disease of the grapevine cultivar Kyohou (V. viniferax V. labrusca) was noticed

Cited by 14 publications

References 4 publications

The genus Phomopsis: biology, applications, species concepts and names of common phytopathogens

The genus Phomopsis: biology, applications, species concepts and names of common phytopathogens

Diaporthe diversity and pathogenicity revealed from a broad survey of grapevine diseases in Europe

A review of the phylogeny and biology of the Diaporthales

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About