2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12664-020-01022-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diarrhea in kidney transplant recipients: Etiology and outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In study of etiological agent of diarrhea in transplant recipients from Northern India and Western India, diarrhea was caused by infectious agents in 65% and 51% respectively. 10,11 Similar to the present study, studies from Turkey and Belgium had reported infectious agents were the etiology in 30-40%. 7,9,12 However, in a single-centre study from USA, no specific etiology was identified in majority (70%) of the episodes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In study of etiological agent of diarrhea in transplant recipients from Northern India and Western India, diarrhea was caused by infectious agents in 65% and 51% respectively. 10,11 Similar to the present study, studies from Turkey and Belgium had reported infectious agents were the etiology in 30-40%. 7,9,12 However, in a single-centre study from USA, no specific etiology was identified in majority (70%) of the episodes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similarly, C difficile was the commonest bacterial pathogen identified in the single-centre study from USA 8 In this study, 30% diarrheal episodes were related to immunosuppression drugs. In other studies from India, immunosuppression drugs was the etiology in 17-38% 10,11,13 Based on cost analysis of diagnostic tests done for evaluating diarrhea in solid organ transplant recipients, it has been recommended to do step-wise testing strategy for community-onset diarrhea. In first step, testing for C difficile, CMV, and food-borne bacterial enteropathogens was recommended.…”
Section: Ta B L E 3 Diagnostic Yield Of Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 12 ] The former may also explain the higher number of episodes being due to an infectious etiology in our study (64.3%) in comparison to that reported from the USRDS data (16.7%). [ 3 ] The higher prevalence of infections cause (compared to the reported Indian studies) may have to do with the detailed protocol-based evaluation of each episode and the number of infectious episodes was similar to another Indian study[ 13 ] which reported more than half of episodes being due to infectious causes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…However, the role of gut microbiota, being called “the second genome,” in the pharmacokinetics of CSA might be neglected. Studies mentioned that there could be higher risks of graft failure and all-cause mortality in transplant patients with diarrhoea than patients without diarrhoea, but adjusting the dose of immunological agents could improve about 20% of these patients’ graft survival ( Kim et al, 2020 ; Sonambekar et al, 2020 ). This suggests that microbiota disturbance is a potential factor affecting the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%