2019
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diatom ecological response to deposition of the 833-850 CE White River Ash (east lobe) ashfall in a small subarctic Canadian lake

Abstract: A <5 mm thick volcanic ashfall layer associated with the White River Ash (east lobe [WRAe]) originating from the eruption of Mount Churchill, Alaska (833-850 CE; 1,117–1,100 cal BP) was observed in two freeze cores obtained from Pocket Lake (62.5090°N, −114.3719°W), a small subarctic lake located within the city limits of Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada. Here we analyze changes in diatom assemblages to assess impact of tephra deposition on the aquatic biota of a subarctic lake. In a well-dated core … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed WRAe deposit (<5 mm), derived from the Plinian-style Mount Churchill Eruption (White River Ash, ~1100 cal BP; Patterson et al, 2017) had a short-term impact on sediment size fractionation, and metals but resulted in no immediate change in the diatom community (Hutchinson et al, 2019). However, after the event there were increases in Stauroneis spp., Sellaphora spp., Pinnularia spp., Neidium spp., and Encyonopsis spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observed WRAe deposit (<5 mm), derived from the Plinian-style Mount Churchill Eruption (White River Ash, ~1100 cal BP; Patterson et al, 2017) had a short-term impact on sediment size fractionation, and metals but resulted in no immediate change in the diatom community (Hutchinson et al, 2019). However, after the event there were increases in Stauroneis spp., Sellaphora spp., Pinnularia spp., Neidium spp., and Encyonopsis spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2200 cal BP) an r-strategist, also supports the observation that a period of stability persisted in the lake during this time. The reduction of EM2 and EM3 at 55–56 cm is the result of the White River Ash tephra deposit 1100 years ago cal BP (Hutchinson et al, 2019; Patterson et al, 2017). After the eruption and deposition of tephra, there is a shift in grain size to EM4 during the MWA (53–40 cm; ca.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A decrease in spruce would have reduced riverside vegetation and woody debris that harbored salmon fry and regulated water temperatures crucial to successful incubation (Martin et al., 1986). Resident lake fish were harmed by changes in silica and pH levels in water that altered phytoplankton, algae, chironomid, amphipod, and diatom communities (Abella, 1988; Hutchinson et al., 2019; Kurenkov, 1966). However, we predict that anadromous fish recovered within ten years thanks to salmonid life cycles (roughly five years) and plankton blooms associated with ash input (Bisson et al., 1988, 2005; Parsons and Whitney, 2012).…”
Section: The Ecology Of White River Ash Eastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volcanic events can be significant triggers of ecological change in lakes. Depending on tephra composition and limnological characteristics, dissolution of tephra can alter water chemistry, modify the lake ecosystem, and change the sediment composition (Hutchinson et al 2019;Massaferro and Corley 1998;Telford et al 2004). In many cases, ashfall increases turbidity in lakes, reduces light penetration and modifies biotic communities (Barker et al 2000;Hutchinson et al 2019;Lotter and Birks 1993;Mayr et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies, however, argued that the response of diatom assemblages to volcanic ash also depends on other factors such as lake morphology (e.g. lake surface area, water volume), water chemistry, sedimentology, and thickness of the tephra (Hutchinson et al 2019;Telford et al 2004). Serra et al (2016) found that even though diatoms and chironomids decrease in abundance associated with deposition of tephra layers, chironomids do not seem to decline as much as diatoms, which almost disappear after a tephra layer is deposited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%