1889
DOI: 10.1002/prac.18890390102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diazo‐ und Azoverbindungen der Fettreihe. IV. Abhandlung. Ueber das Hydrazin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1892
1892
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Originally cyclic structures of type 2 were attributed to diazoacetic acid derivatives by Curtius [1] and to diazomethane by Pechmann. [2] Later, Angeli, [3] Thiele, [4] and Langmuir [5] provided evidence supporting the linear form 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Originally cyclic structures of type 2 were attributed to diazoacetic acid derivatives by Curtius [1] and to diazomethane by Pechmann. [2] Later, Angeli, [3] Thiele, [4] and Langmuir [5] provided evidence supporting the linear form 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The name hydrazine was applied by Emil Fischer to the hypothetical substance N-JL, which he considered to be the parent substance of phenylhydrazine, isolated in 1875 (11, 11¡). Curtius isolated the first hydrazine salts in 1887 (6,6). Piloty, Fischer, Baeyer, and other workers found that hydrazine, and more especially phenylhydrazine (9), p-bromophenylhydrazine (10), and semicarbazide (2, 8) were of value in preparing derivatives of carbonyl compounds.…”
Section: Historicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the arguments concerning the structure of these compounds have been reviewed recently (332), only a brief out- line of this topic will be given here. Curtins (86) originally used the ring formula, Rx /N , which was accepted for many years until Angelí (7,8) suggested the openchain formula C=N=N Thiele (355), as a result of the work of Staudinger (337), also advocated the open-chain formula. Further work, either of a physical or chemical nature, led to ambiguous results.…”
Section: Rc-cr'mentioning
confidence: 99%