2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.10.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diazotroph community structure and abundance in wheat–fallow and wheat–pea crop rotations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

12
50
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
12
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, a concurrent increase in the abundance of these two microorganisms is important to vegetation restoration in karst regions. Additionally, compared with results from other ecosystems (Reardon et al 2014), nifH gene abundance (Fig. 1) was slightly higher in our study site, lending credence to the suggestion that nitrogenfixing bacteria contribute more to nitrogen input in karst ecosystems.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Thus, a concurrent increase in the abundance of these two microorganisms is important to vegetation restoration in karst regions. Additionally, compared with results from other ecosystems (Reardon et al 2014), nifH gene abundance (Fig. 1) was slightly higher in our study site, lending credence to the suggestion that nitrogenfixing bacteria contribute more to nitrogen input in karst ecosystems.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This is a popular and effective method to analyze specific microbial groups at the molecular level [50]. The significance of crop rotation for the development of agro-ecological sustainability has been well documented in terms of soil structure maintenance, soil fertility improvement, and total soil microbial diversity richness [51][52][53]. Thus, it is important to explore the effects of the garlic/cucumber crop rotation system on microbial diversity or richness under long-term field conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They observed that plant species and biomass retention influenced the structure of the soil microbial community (Hsu and Buckley, 2009;Mao et al, 2011). Yin et al (2010) reported that soil microbial communities are affected by agricultural practices due to highly complex interactions and that community structure variability was also greatly influenced by fertilization (Poly et al, 2001;Reardon et al, 2014). In this study, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 crop rotations were conducted under corporate practices in which crop biomass was partly retained, and fertilization varied with crop.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional investigations into the soil microbial community are based on isolation cultures or 16 S/18 S rRNA gene whole or specific community fingerprinting techniques such as real-time PCR, terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP) (Hilton et al, 2013;Reardon et al, 2014), and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). However, these methods can only detect dominant microbial groups and thus do not provide deep community coverage and resolution (Li et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%