2023
DOI: 10.3389/frevc.2023.1173925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Did China's dual-credit policy promote innovation in new energy vehicle enterprises? An empirical study based on the PSM-DID method

Abstract: IntroductionBased on the microdata of 36 A-share new energy vehicle (NEV) enterprises from 2015 to 2021, this study empirically investigates whether the introduction of the double credit policy (DCP) promoted the innovation of NEV enterprises.MethodsThe propensity score matching difference-in-differences (PSM-DID) method was used.ResultsThe following results were found. First, the introduction of the DCP inhibits the innovation of NEV enterprises. However, as the DCP stabilizes, the inhibitory effect gradually… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, previous studies only use the "quantity" of innovation as a measure of enterprise innovation to study factors affecting enterprise innovation, neglecting the diversity and complexity of innovation and failing to provide a comprehensive assessment of enterprise innovation [ 76 , 77 ]. This paper undertakes a thorough analysis of the impact of the policy on enterprise innovation, considering both the aspects of "quantity" and "quality".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, previous studies only use the "quantity" of innovation as a measure of enterprise innovation to study factors affecting enterprise innovation, neglecting the diversity and complexity of innovation and failing to provide a comprehensive assessment of enterprise innovation [ 76 , 77 ]. This paper undertakes a thorough analysis of the impact of the policy on enterprise innovation, considering both the aspects of "quantity" and "quality".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%