Did legal regulations change the reporting frequency of sharp injuries of medical personnel? Study from 36 hospitals in Łódź province, Poland

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study has been to analyze the epidemiological data on sharp injuries among health care workers before and after the implementation of regulations related to the conduct of the register of sharp injuries. Material and Methods: We hypothesized that the introduction of legislation would change the existing low reportability of sharp injuries and reporting incidents would increase. In Poland the binding regulations, dating back to 2013, require the employer to keep a record of sharp injuries. Therefore, we compared the data from before and after the entry regulations. Data was collected from the records of occupational exposure/accidents at work in hospitals in the Łódź Province during 2010-2014. The feedback came from 36 hospitals (return index = 51.5%), representing a total annual average of 13 211 medical workers. Results: The incidence of injuries did not change significantly over the period 2010-2014, and the number of reported injuries in 2014 (the year when the Regulation had already been effective) was even lower than in the previous years. The average annual injury index was 12.31 injuries per 1000 employees (95% confidence interval: 11.48-13.16/1000). The incidence of injuries among nurses was significantly higher than in other groups of medical professionals (p < 0.05). These injuries most often occur while using needles (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The obligation to record occupational exposures set forth in current regulations is not likely to improve the reliability of reporting the incidents actually taking place. Further research should focus on identifying barriers to reporting cases of exposure to potentially infectious material. Action should be taken to raise awareness of medical personnel about the possible effects of exposure to infectious material, in particular, the benefits of the implementation of early post-exposure procedures. Perhaps it will increase the reporting frequency of sharp injuries of medical personnel. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2018;31(1):37-46

Behaviors and Attitudes of Polish Health Care Workers with Respect to the Hazards from Blood-Borne Pathogens: A Questionnaire-Based Study

“…In the study Martins et al 65% of employees of a selected hospital in Portugal reported having experienced at least one NSSI in the last 5 years [20]. Most of the events, similar to ours and other studies (Polish and international) [21,22,23,24,25] concerned nurses. It should be noted that nurses are the most numerous professional group among medical employees, they perform the most treatments and usually have direct contact with patients.…”

Epidemiology of needlestick and sharp injuries among health care workers based on records from 252 hospitals for the period 2010–2014, Poland

“…In collecting data, the authors encountered a number of limitations which are described in detail in the paper by Garus-Pakowska et al, 2018 [23]. It is worth to remember that the collected data is merely approximate; we estimated 45.2% underreporting but it is not known how many people failed to report the fact of puncture.…”

“…There are no precise Polish data on a number of the occupational NSIs. Previous studies in Poland were based on registers of the selected, usually single hospital [22], sometimes based on registers of several hospitals in a selected region of Poland [23, 24]. A second type of research is a questionnaire survey done among various groups of the HCWs [25–27].…”

Seroprevalence of anti-HBc, risk factors of occupationally acquired HBV infection and HBV vaccination among hospital staff in Poland: a multicenter study

“…Although surveys assessing the risk of occupationally BBIs have been conducted among HCWs in the region, most papers have concentrated on the frequency and circumstances of occupational exposure to blood [17, 28–30]. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no recent multicenter survey, conducted in the Central Europe after the implementation of the Council Directive, which assessed the epidemiology of SIs and the use of SDs in the context of HBV seroprevalence and vaccination of HCWs.…”