2022
DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Did sexism drive Latino support for Trump? Latinx, sexism, and presidential vote choice

Abstract: Background While the “machismo” media narrative explaining Donald Trump's electoral support among Latinxs has some intuitive appeal, the relative dearth of scholarship on the influence of sexism on Latinx political attitudes precludes critical evaluation of this claim. Objective This study aims to determine whether Latinxs exhibit more sexist attitudes, compared to other racial/ethnic groups and whether sexism has a differential impact on Latinx electoral support for Trump, compared to non‐Latinx counterparts.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although scholars offer several different insights and theories as to why there continue to be more barriers to success for some than others, work on gender issues here is the most developed and has long pointed to perceptions of females being less competent and intelligent than their male counterparts (Schuck 1974). Not only are female academics described as being "intelligent," "brilliant," and "smart" at lower rates than male counterparts and evaluated more harshly than male counterparts by students (Bates 2015;MacNell et al 2015), some scholars' work suggests that female scholarship is deemed lower in quality and that female scholars are deemed less desirable for research collaboration than male scholars by graduate students (Knobloch-Westerwick et al 2013).…”
Section: Research Production and Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although scholars offer several different insights and theories as to why there continue to be more barriers to success for some than others, work on gender issues here is the most developed and has long pointed to perceptions of females being less competent and intelligent than their male counterparts (Schuck 1974). Not only are female academics described as being "intelligent," "brilliant," and "smart" at lower rates than male counterparts and evaluated more harshly than male counterparts by students (Bates 2015;MacNell et al 2015), some scholars' work suggests that female scholarship is deemed lower in quality and that female scholars are deemed less desirable for research collaboration than male scholars by graduate students (Knobloch-Westerwick et al 2013).…”
Section: Research Production and Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%