1996
DOI: 10.2307/2597763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Did Smallpox Reduce Height? Stature and the Standard of Living in London, 1770-1873

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The detrimental living conditions of the industrial environment inevitably led to increased morbidity and mortality and was said to be “peculiarly severe on infant life” (Report of the Commissioners, : p. 5). Social and economic historians have written extensively on the impact of industrialization on the growth and health of children throughout England during this period (Floud, Wachter, & Gregory, ; Humphries & Leunig, ; Kirby, ; Nicholas & Steckel, ; Oxley, ; Sharpe, ; Voth & Leunig, ). Bioarchaeological studies of urban health in 18th and 19th century England, however, currently have a strong London‐based bias (for some examples, see Hassett, ; Henderson, Lee‐Thorp, & Loe, ; Ives & Brickley, , Ives & Humphrey, ; King, Humphrey, & Hillson, ; Lewis, , Lewis, ; Pinhasi, Shaw, White, & Ogden, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detrimental living conditions of the industrial environment inevitably led to increased morbidity and mortality and was said to be “peculiarly severe on infant life” (Report of the Commissioners, : p. 5). Social and economic historians have written extensively on the impact of industrialization on the growth and health of children throughout England during this period (Floud, Wachter, & Gregory, ; Humphries & Leunig, ; Kirby, ; Nicholas & Steckel, ; Oxley, ; Sharpe, ; Voth & Leunig, ). Bioarchaeological studies of urban health in 18th and 19th century England, however, currently have a strong London‐based bias (for some examples, see Hassett, ; Henderson, Lee‐Thorp, & Loe, ; Ives & Brickley, , Ives & Humphrey, ; King, Humphrey, & Hillson, ; Lewis, , Lewis, ; Pinhasi, Shaw, White, & Ogden, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Szreter and Mooney, ‘Urbanization’; Voth and Leunig, ‘Smallpox’; Oxley, ‘“Seat of death”’; and ensuing debate (Voth and Leunig, ‘Comment’; Oxley, ‘“Pitted but not pitied”’); Sharpe, ‘Short stature’. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Oxley, ‘ “Seat of death and terror” ’; Voth and Leunig, ‘Did smallpox reduce height?’; Leunig and Voth, ‘Smallpox did reduce height’; Leunig and Voth, ‘Smallpox really did reduce height’; Razzell, ‘Did smallpox reduce height?’; Razzell, ‘Final comment’; Heintel and Baten, ‘Smallpox’; Leunig and Voth, ‘Comment’; Oxley, ‘ “Pitted but not pitied” ’. For a recent summary of the debate, see Voth, ‘Living standards’. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%