2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Did you have sex with him? Do you love her? An in vivo test of sex differences in jealous interrogations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, researchers could explore the sex difference in jealousy using physiological measures looking at people who have experienced an actual infidelity, where scripts describing the participants' actual infidelity experience would likely elicit greater arousal and demonstrate that these differences are not limited to imagined infidelities (although it is worth reiterating that studies using self-report measures have demonstrated that the sex difference in jealousy occurs in retrospective self-reports (e.g., Edlund et al 2006). Beyond this, if the ethical issues could be resolved, the best way to demonstrate this would be to look at in vivo jealousy responses (e.g., Kuhle 2011). Additionally, other physiological measures may exist that have been demonstrated to be useful in socially monogamous mammals that have not been explored in the context of the sex difference in jealousy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, researchers could explore the sex difference in jealousy using physiological measures looking at people who have experienced an actual infidelity, where scripts describing the participants' actual infidelity experience would likely elicit greater arousal and demonstrate that these differences are not limited to imagined infidelities (although it is worth reiterating that studies using self-report measures have demonstrated that the sex difference in jealousy occurs in retrospective self-reports (e.g., Edlund et al 2006). Beyond this, if the ethical issues could be resolved, the best way to demonstrate this would be to look at in vivo jealousy responses (e.g., Kuhle 2011). Additionally, other physiological measures may exist that have been demonstrated to be useful in socially monogamous mammals that have not been explored in the context of the sex difference in jealousy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This seems especially likely to be the case for extradyadic romantic relationships which may pose a threat to the existing relationship above and beyond other activities a partner can engage in (e.g., catching a movie with a friend). For example, research has shown that when people imagine (Harris, 2000;Thompson, Zimmerman, Kulibert, & Moore, 2017) or discover (Edlund, Heider, Scherer, Farc, & Sagarin, 2006;Kuhle, 2011) a partner's extradyadic romantic involvement they often engage in behaviors like mate guarding (Buss, 2002;Buss, Shackelford, & McKibbin, 2008), and report negative emotional experiences like jealousy (AlShawaf, Conroy-Beam, Asao, & Buss, 2016; Buss 2000 for a review of research), which may help to prevent the potential loss of a romantic partner.…”
Section: Emotional Ambivalence In Response To Extradyadic Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Men and women face challenges when selecting, attracting, and retaining mates. Prior research documents robust sex differences in men’s and women’s typical mate preferences (see Schmitt, 2015 , for a review), mate retention behaviors (e.g., Lopes et al, 2017 ), and reactions to real or hypothetical partner loss (e.g., Kuhle, 2011 ). Men tend to report greater distress imagining a partner’s sexual contact with another man whereas women report greater distress from a partner’s emotional or financial investment in another woman (see Sagarin et al, 2012 , for a review).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%