Didaktik som lärarutbildningens innehåll och form. Motstånd, utmaningar och möjligheter

Rytzler, Johannes; Magnússon, Gunnlaugur

doi:10.48059/uod.v29i1.1136

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2021

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Klafki 1995, pp. 23-24, see also Rytzler & Magnússon 2020). Naturally, such considerations are also not by any means isolated to the Swedish context.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Who? Didactics, differentiation and the biopolitics of inequality

Bylund¹,

Knutsson²

2021

U&D

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The three didactic questions – what?, how? and why? – are increasingly supplemented with a fourth: who? Drawing on Therborn’s distinction between difference and inequality, as well as on biopolitical theory, the present paper engages critically with the didactic who?-question. The paper situates the who?-question in broader discussions of educational differentiation, suggesting that it encompasses a tension between the recognition of difference and (re)production of inequality. Arguably, this tension becomes visible, and possibly more navigable, when we pose “Therbornian questions”. The paper further suggests that the who?-question can be understood, in biopolitical terms, as a technique for constructing various student populations as appropriate for different kinds of education. Such management of difference, the paper warns, can easily slip into a biopolitics of inequality. Despite our critical observations, we conclude that there might still be radical potential in the who?-question, provided that it is handed over to the students and that careful attention is paid to societal relations.

show abstract

“…Klafki 1995, pp. 23-24, see also Rytzler & Magnússon 2020). Naturally, such considerations are also not by any means isolated to the Swedish context.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Who? Didactics, differentiation and the biopolitics of inequality

Bylund¹,

Knutsson²

2021

U&D

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Didaktik som lärarutbildningens innehåll och form. Motstånd, utmaningar och möjligheter

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

The Who? Didactics, differentiation and the biopolitics of inequality

The Who? Didactics, differentiation and the biopolitics of inequality

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About