2003
DOI: 10.1007/bf03004567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die Acritarcha: ihre Klassifikation, Morphologie, Ultrastruktur und paläoökologische/paläogeographische Verbreitung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The Acritarch sp. 2, similar to specimens of the Sphaeromorphitae subgroup, and the specimes assigned to the genera Michrystridium are characteristic of shallow coastal water associations (Montenari andLeppig 2003, Félix andSouza 2012). The genera of dinoflagellate cysts Spiniferites and Operculodinium correspond to gonyaulacoids forms, which have a cosmopolitan character, being recorded in a wide range of environments, from internal neritic to open ocean, revealing tolerance to a large range of salinity, luminosity, nutrients and temperature (de Vernal et al 2001, Marret andZonneveld 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The Acritarch sp. 2, similar to specimens of the Sphaeromorphitae subgroup, and the specimes assigned to the genera Michrystridium are characteristic of shallow coastal water associations (Montenari andLeppig 2003, Félix andSouza 2012). The genera of dinoflagellate cysts Spiniferites and Operculodinium correspond to gonyaulacoids forms, which have a cosmopolitan character, being recorded in a wide range of environments, from internal neritic to open ocean, revealing tolerance to a large range of salinity, luminosity, nutrients and temperature (de Vernal et al 2001, Marret andZonneveld 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…It has been assumed that the marine Melanocyrillium and nine similar genera of vase-like fossils that date back at least 760 My (less clearly, perhaps as long ago as ∼800 My) are a mixture of arcellinid lobosan Amoebozoa, which however are all freshwater organisms, and euglyphid Cercozoa (Porter et al 2003). I do not agree that any are euglyphids (Cavalier-Smith 2006a) and have argued that none of them can on morphological grounds be safely assigned either to Amoebozoa or Cercozoa and that as they became extinct ∼600 My ago (Montenari and Leppig 2003) soon after the Neoproterozoic snowball earth episodes, or perhaps a bit later (Sergeev 2006), they are more likely to represent an unknown group of early protozoa that became extinct and were supplanted by foraminifera as the dominant occupants of the marine testate 'amoeba' adaptive zone (Cavalier-Smith 2009a). There are vase-shaped fossils dating from 551 to 541 My ago that have been identified as the first Foraminifera (Hua et al 2010) because of their large size and hint of mineralization, but it is hard to exclude the possibility that they are instead the last of the non-foraminiferan vase-shaped fossils.…”
Section: How Old Are Choanozoa Amoebozoa Sulcozoa and Loukozoa?mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Acritarcos são protistas unicelulares, constituídos por cistos de parede orgânica, considerados como o grupo mais antigo de organismos marinhos com organização celular eucarió-tica (MONTENARI & LEPPIG 2003). O termo foi cunhado por William Evittem 1963 (do grego akritos = incerto, arche = origem), correspondendo a um grupo fitoplanctônico, morfologicamente variado e de provável origem polifilética.…”
Section: Generalidades E Aspectos Morfológicosunclassified
“…Para MONTENARI & LEPPIG (2003), as associações de acritarcos são controladas tanto por parâmetros sedimentológicos como ecológicos, e divididas em quatro tipos característicos de fácies: costeiras de águas rasas, plataformais proximais, plataformais distais e bacinais de águas profundas (Figura 7). Os autores observaram que a ocorrência dos acritarcos varia de forma diretamente dependente da granulometria.…”
Section: Potencial Paleoambientalunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation