Die Ausbildung von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern als Multiplikatoren für den Wiederbelebungsunterricht an Schulen

Wingen, Sabine; Rott, Nadine; Dirks, B.; Greif, Robert; Papaspyrou, H.; Eckstein, Anja; Lambertz, P.; Koch-Schultze, Ruth; Böttiger, Bernd W.

doi:10.1007/s10049-021-00870-4

Cited by 6 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We found 12 Editorials [1–12], 9 ‘Letters to the Editor [13–21]’, 2 ‘Special Reports [22–23]’, 4 Reviews [24–27], 2 Guidelines [28,29 ▪▪ ], 9 Original Articles [30–36,37 ▪ ,38 ▪ ], and 17 Conference or Poster Abstracts [39–55], which are in Table 1. Among the nine original articles, we found three randomized controlled trials (RCT), two longitudinal studies and four cross-sectional studies (Table 2).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The other cross-sectional study [32] with students showed few proportions of the boys (aged 12–14 years) and girls (aged 14–16 years) reached the proper compression depth (5–6 cm), making final considerations that to acquire CPR skills, more exertion and training are needed for younger children and adolescents. The fourth cross-sectional study [36] found that schoolteachers are slightly more effective than medical staff to improve students’ CPR knowledge and skills.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One author (I.C.S.) filled a table (Table 1) [1–10,11 ▪▪ ,12–28,29 ▪▪ ,30–36,37 ▪ ,38 ▪ ,39–55] with general information on the type of publication, first author, country, year, journal, and study title. For data extraction, we used the original articles.…”

Section: Data Extractionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

KIDS SAVE LIVES: a narrative review of associated scientific production

Nakagawa

Salles

Semeraro

et al. 2021

Current Opinion in Critical Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of reviewIn sudden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is one of the most important elements of the chain of survival. Since 2015, international health societies and associations have recognized KIDS SAVE LIVES (KSL) as an essential initiative on CPR principles dissemination among schoolchildren. Children can be potential multipliers of the CPR competencies by teaching families, relatives, and friends. This review aimed to determine the main CPR issues raised in the KSL-associated publications. Recent findingsWe found 12 Editorials, 9 Letters, 2 Special Reports, 4 Reviews, 2 Guidelines, 9 Original Articles and 17 Conference Presentations on KSL history, the schoolchildren CPR education, and KSL program implementation in several countries. In nine original studies, the main issues were instructors' and learners' CPR knowledge, skills, and retention, gender and physical aspects affecting CPR performance, types of KSL programs and new technologies to teach CPR.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

KIDS SAVE LIVES: a narrative review of associated scientific production

Nakagawa

Salles

Semeraro

et al. 2021

Current Opinion in Critical Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Trained teachers are very reliable in implementing CPR education in their schools. 47 The multiplier effect, the number of trained schoolchildren per trained teacher, is 38 47 and effectiveness of the training was proven by Felzen et al 48 Another approach to the systematic education of schoolteachers in CPR is integrating mandatory CPR education into the routine training syllabus of teachers. 10,39,40,49 This would support systematic CPR education of schoolchildren, the main goal of the KIDS SAVE LIVES-statement, instead of CPR training as part of voluntary campaigns and projects.…”

Section: Level 4: Facilitators and Barriers Regarding Individual Schoolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Facilitators and barriers for the implementation of resuscitation training programmes for schoolchildren

Wingen¹,

Jeck²,

Schroeder³

et al. 2021

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUNDTraining schoolchildren in resuscitation seems to improve rates of resuscitation by bystanders. Leading medical societies recommend comprehensive resuscitation education in schools. To date, no widespread implementation within the European Union has happened.OBJECTIVEThe study aim was to identify facilitators and barriers for the implementation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for schoolchildren within the European Union.DESIGNSystematic review.DATA SOURCESA literature search in PubMed was conducted between 1 January 1999 and 30 June 2020 in accordance with the PRISMA statement. The search terms ‘resuscitation’, ‘children’ and ‘Europe’ were combined with the Boolean Operator ‘AND’ and ‘OR’. Medical subject heading terms were used in order to include relevant articles.ELIGIBILITY CRITERIAArticles were included if cardiopulmonary resuscitation training specifically tailored for schoolchildren aged 12 to 18 years was considered in countries of the European Union. Articles that fulfilled the following criteria were excluded: duplicates, training methods only for specific patient groups, articles not accessible in the English language, and articles that did not include original data.Findings were structured by an evidence-based six-level approach to examine barriers and facilitators in healthcare.RESULTSThirty out of 2005 articles were identified. Large variations in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training approaches ranging from conventional to innovative training methods can be observed. Schoolteachers as resuscitation instructors act either as barrier or facilitator depending on their personal attitude and their exposure to training in resuscitation. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in schoolchildren is effective. The uncoordinated interplay between the generally motivated schools and the political orientation towards resuscitation training for schoolchildren serve as barrier. The lack of financial support, absent systematic organisation, and standardisation of training create major barriers.CONCLUSIONTraining schoolchildren in cardiopulmonary resuscitation is effective. More financial support and political guidance is needed. Until then, local initiatives, motivated teachers, and dedicated principles combined with innovative and low-cost training methods facilitate cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in schools.

show abstract

“…They are considered as the ideal multipliers for resuscitation training in schools. 4 Schoolteachers core competency is to adequately teach skills, knowledge, and behavior as they learned didactics and methodologies for children's teaching. Thus, who better than them to teach BLS to schoolchildren?…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%