1981
DOI: 10.1002/mmnz.19810570204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die bedeutung hirnmorphologischer Merkmale für die taxonomie der placentalen säucer

Abstract: Traits of the central nervous system have up to now played only a minor role in taxonomic practice. Based on the macromorphology of the brain in several mammalian orders, the present paper gives the methodological assumptions that should be taken in account when characteristics of the brain are used taxonomically. The conclusions that may be drawn from an analysis of such traits for a taxonomic division of certain orders are discussed. The extent to which some clearly anagenetic processes are taxonomically sig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
6
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This flocculus is located medioventrally compared to the paraflocculus, which is consistent with what is illustrated by Larsell & Dow (1935). Moreover, a cerebellar structure distinguishes from the paraflocculus on the frontal plane of the stereotaxic atlas of the Rousettus aegyptiacus brain (Schneider 1966: e.g Hackethal (1981) also illustrates in most species a medioventral flocculus, of varying size. Contrary to Maugoust & Orliac (2021), we consider that the flocculus can be visible on the external aspect of the chiropteran brain.…”
Section: Neural Structures (Figs 3-7)supporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This flocculus is located medioventrally compared to the paraflocculus, which is consistent with what is illustrated by Larsell & Dow (1935). Moreover, a cerebellar structure distinguishes from the paraflocculus on the frontal plane of the stereotaxic atlas of the Rousettus aegyptiacus brain (Schneider 1966: e.g Hackethal (1981) also illustrates in most species a medioventral flocculus, of varying size. Contrary to Maugoust & Orliac (2021), we consider that the flocculus can be visible on the external aspect of the chiropteran brain.…”
Section: Neural Structures (Figs 3-7)supporting
confidence: 83%
“…McDaniel (1976) also describes extensively the external morphology of the brain of phyllostomid bats -even if it concerns one particular group in my clade of interest, its methodology may stand. Hackethal (1981) reviews what has been done regarding the cerebral and cerebellar morphology in whole mammals, order by order; if its discussion about the cerebral morphology in bats is a summary and a discussion of the previous works, his work about cerebellar morphology is way more complete, with numerous figures and an impressive anatomical content discussed family by family. These works highly complete the review of Baron et al (1996, the main work used for bats brain by Maugoust & Orliac [2021]), who compiled a large dataset of brain metrics and shortly discussed about the brain of bats in an evolutionary framework.…”
Section: Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations