2008
DOI: 10.1024/1661-8157.97.6.297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die quantitative Messung der Echogenität des Nierenparenchyms

Abstract: The qualitative assessment of the echogenicity of the renal cortex and the medulla is one of the most important diagnostic criteria in the assessment of diffuse renal parenchymal disease. It is of interest to complete this assessment by quantitative data. The echogenicity of the cortex and medulla was quantitatively analysed in digitized images. The coefficient of variation of repeated measurements was 0.83% and the coefficient of variation made by two different individuals was 2.03%. The influence of furosemi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no association between PN use at the time and these sonographic changes. It is, however, important to note that the diagnosis of increased renal parenchymal echogenicity can be subjective (38,39), with 1 study showing a mean variation of 3% between measurements obtained by 2 different individuals on identical sonographic images (38), and another study showing a coefficient of variation of 0.83 on repeated measurements made by 2 different individuals (40). Interoperator differences could, therefore, have affected these results to some degree.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no association between PN use at the time and these sonographic changes. It is, however, important to note that the diagnosis of increased renal parenchymal echogenicity can be subjective (38,39), with 1 study showing a mean variation of 3% between measurements obtained by 2 different individuals on identical sonographic images (38), and another study showing a coefficient of variation of 0.83 on repeated measurements made by 2 different individuals (40). Interoperator differences could, therefore, have affected these results to some degree.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, cases that account for the smallest and largest values are never misinterpreted. Second, variables that could affect renal cortical echogenicity, like the subject's state of hydration [19] or the administration of furosemide [21] were neglected. However, water loading determined a mean increase in echogenicity of only 6.4% [19] and the qualitatively furosemide effect was limited to the medullary pyramids [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, variables that could affect renal cortical echogenicity, like the subject's state of hydration [19] or the administration of furosemide [21] were neglected. However, water loading determined a mean increase in echogenicity of only 6.4% [19] and the qualitatively furosemide effect was limited to the medullary pyramids [21]. Although the assignment of an individual weighting echogenicity factor to an individual patient instead of a mean for each subset of patient seems more appropriate, it is difficult to integrate into clinical practice because it is cumbersome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a . Echogenicity was measured according to prior reported method [ 10 12 ]. A contrast enhanced ultrasound was performed displaying a distinct different perfusion pattern of these two areas.…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%