2019
DOI: 10.1055/a-0666-9881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die Rolle von Expertenbeiräten in der Palliativforschung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The board will enhance the relevance, quality and acceptance of the research project by co-shaping the project and advising on the prioritization of the results [ 66 ]. It will operate via three in-person meetings (project months 4, 8 and 21, respectively) and one Delphi study (project month 23).…”
Section: Methods and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The board will enhance the relevance, quality and acceptance of the research project by co-shaping the project and advising on the prioritization of the results [ 66 ]. It will operate via three in-person meetings (project months 4, 8 and 21, respectively) and one Delphi study (project month 23).…”
Section: Methods and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nearly 37% of all deaths took place in hospitals, which is the most common place of death in our care receiving cohort as well as in the total German population [20][21][22] and in those of most other countries [23][24][25].…”
Section: Actual Place Of Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the hospital, the own home was found as the second most common place of death with 26.6%, which was also found by Dasch certificates from 2007 and from 2017. They showed that while in 2007 home also was the second most frequent place of death (26.1%), it slid to third place in 2017 with 19.8% [20]. Taking results of published studies together, the likelihood to die at home has been decreasing since recent years [20,22,26].…”
Section: Actual Place Of Deathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to data collection, an interview guide was developed by the project team members (FAH, SSt) and scrutinized in a first meeting of the project's scientific advisory board (January 2018). 24,25 The interview was designed to elicit participants' experiences and needs regarding their relationship and relationship roles within the dyad; it was also designed to encourage participants to freely provide their perspectives. 26,27 Interviews were conducted by a trained researcher (FAH, LG) in the patient's room; in one of the recruitment centers (e.g.…”
Section: Data Collection and Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%