2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11573-010-0376-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die steuerliche Berücksichtigung von Refinanzierungsaufwendungen beim internationalen Unternehmenskauf

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One opinion is that to deny deductions on interest incurred to finance international investments that yield foreign income not subject to domestic tax is consistent with the matching principle. In contrast under the credit system, the danger of eroding the domestic tax base is not present, as the deduction of financing costs is conceded at the same rate at which foreign profits are taxed, which saves tax 238 JAAR 14,3 neutrality (Ruf, 2010), but reduces marginal prices. Following the international debate on firms eroding the domestic tax base through conducting highly leveraged transactions, it seems to be a matter of time until Japan and the UK, as a consequence of the change, discuss overhauling their anti-erosion measures such as interest deduction regulations to combat the negative consequences of introducing the exemption system at the expense of the competitiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One opinion is that to deny deductions on interest incurred to finance international investments that yield foreign income not subject to domestic tax is consistent with the matching principle. In contrast under the credit system, the danger of eroding the domestic tax base is not present, as the deduction of financing costs is conceded at the same rate at which foreign profits are taxed, which saves tax 238 JAAR 14,3 neutrality (Ruf, 2010), but reduces marginal prices. Following the international debate on firms eroding the domestic tax base through conducting highly leveraged transactions, it seems to be a matter of time until Japan and the UK, as a consequence of the change, discuss overhauling their anti-erosion measures such as interest deduction regulations to combat the negative consequences of introducing the exemption system at the expense of the competitiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This applies to both UK and Japan investors in both international tax systems. Under the credit system the deduction of the financing costs diminishes the tax base at the same tax rate, at which the income of a subsidiary is taxed saving tax neutrality (Ruf, 2010). For the exemption method the same tax deduction however is subject to the potentially lower foreign tax rate, as long as there is no limitation to tax deductibility of financing expenses, In addition to that a reduced tax or no tax at all applies in the jurisdiction of the parent, while interest expenses are II, the marginal purchase prices for UK and Japan are denoted in monetary units (MU) and are calculated based on Equation ( 9) in connection with the capitalized earnings value Equations ( 1)-( 7) for the two extreme cases of either financing the acquisition entirely via equity or entirely via debt…”
Section: Jaar 143mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 Additionally, evidence indicates that multinationals use tax rate dierences for prot shifting 11 . Ruf (2010) summarizes the tax structuring options in international acquisitions. Generally, multinationals can decide to acquire a given target-company through an acquisition vehicle in the target-country or via a subsidiary in a dierent country.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%