Die Wapokomo

Steinmetz, Sebald Rudolf

doi:10.1007/978-3-662-00278-0_11

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While Kohler interpreted this as a rigid and unnecessarily hierarchical order, Senfft describes how the rules on the Marshall Islands were rather flexible and leniently applied, stresses the important role of women, and gives the strong impression that leaders had to provide and organize not only order, but also insurance and subsistence. This interpretation was recast by the Dutch legal historian Sebald Steinmetz, who edited the first collected volume of answers from the German empire (1903). He never meddled with the original account, but frequently took the liberty of adding comments directly after the printed responses he received from the colonies.…”

Section: Circulating Rights To Resources: the Evidence From A Survey ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Formative encounters: Colonial data collection on land and law in German Micronesia

Echterhölter

2021

Sci Context

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Argument Data collections are a hallmark of nineteenth-century administrative knowledge making, and they were by no means confined to Europe. All colonial empires transferred and translated these techniques of serialised and quantified information gathering to their dominions overseas. The colonial situation affected the encounters underlying vital statistics, enquête methods and land surveying. In this paper, two of those data collections will be investigated—a survey on land and a survey on indigenous law, both conducted around 1910 on the Micronesian island of Pohnpei, which had fallen under German colonial influence a decade earlier. Strikingly, there are no enumerators or envoys of the state visiting the doorsteps of Pohnpei. To facilitate the data collection on homesteads, the whole population of the island was called upon to measure their respective plots of land themselves, without resorting to certified land surveyors. The preserved cadastral lists and spreadsheets testify to a rather peculiar contact between the colonizing administration and the colonized peoples. I argue that the production of data made encounters necessary, which are best observed though a methodological focus on data practices. I argue, furthermore, that the Pohnpeians were prompted during the surveys to define their homestead in new terms. This did not only entail new two-dimensional plots but also a new regime of private property. The change in the legal concept can be seen as a continuation of colonial violence by other means, given that it happened in the aftermath of the defeated Pohnpei Rebellion. The argument of the paper is, therefore, that data collection can have formative effects on society, and that measurement and quantified information are often, as Witold Kula argued, a scene of conflict. At its core, the installation of these metric regimes signified a change in patterns of justification, resource management and the unwritten constitution of the Pacific island.

show abstract

Section: Circulating Rights To Resources: the Evidence From A Survey ...mentioning

confidence: 99%