2010
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1250150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die zementfreie Schenkelhalsprothese CUT – klinisch-radiologische Ergebnisse nach 5 Jahren

Abstract: This study demonstrates the CUT prosthesis as a bone-preserving prosthesis with good functional and radiological results and therefore as an alternative joint replacement in younger patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Only these 3 prostheses showed radiolucent lines in zones 1 and 4, and the excessive continuous migration was mainly in the medial-lateral direction, which is compatible with the reported failure mode of the prosthesis—of increased horizontal migration and varisation (Ender et al 2007, Ishaque et al 2009, Steens et al 2010). Unfortunately, no factors could be related to loosening: no excessive (medial) bone resorption was present and no gross abnormalities, regarding for example stem alignment or the amount of femoral neck resection, were noted.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Only these 3 prostheses showed radiolucent lines in zones 1 and 4, and the excessive continuous migration was mainly in the medial-lateral direction, which is compatible with the reported failure mode of the prosthesis—of increased horizontal migration and varisation (Ender et al 2007, Ishaque et al 2009, Steens et al 2010). Unfortunately, no factors could be related to loosening: no excessive (medial) bone resorption was present and no gross abnormalities, regarding for example stem alignment or the amount of femoral neck resection, were noted.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…3 of the 39 prostheses were revised: 1 prosthesis was revised because of dislocation following excessive subsidence due to usage of an undersized component and 2 prostheses, which were both firmly fixed, were revised due to severe, persistent thigh pain. Severe persistent pain of the operated hip as a reason for revision is not uncommon after implantation of a CUT prosthesis, and has been reported by several authors (Ender et al 2007, Ishaque et al 2009, Steens et al 2010). As such, it may be a characteristic of this particular prosthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Das hat eine voluminösere Geweberesektion des gesunden Knochens bei der Implantation zur Folge. Daher wäre eine dünnwandige titanbasierte Ummantelung des keramischen Inserts vorteilhaft . Eine vielversprechende Beschichtungstechnologie für die gezielte Funktionalisierung von Oberflächen aus Hochleistungskeramik mittels bioaktiver titanbasierter Beschichtung ist das Auftraglöten, durch das die Herstellung einer dünnen Beschichtung ohne massive Knochenresektion beim Protheseneinsatz möglich wird .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified