Temporal niche partitioning is one of the most important strategies for carnivore coexistence. Camera-trap data has been analyzed through several methods to assess the temporal niche partitioning. When different analytical approaches used to evaluate niche partitioning detect different results, the mechanisms of species coexistence may be misinterpreted. As such, it is important to evaluate the temporal niche partitioning from multiple analytical approaches. In this study, we compared three analytical methods–the temporal overlap, temporal co-occurrence, and time-to-encounter analysis–to evaluate the temporal niche partitioning among sympatric medium-sized carnivores: red foxes, raccoon dogs, and Japanese martens. From May to October 2019 and 2020, we obtained the activity of the target species using camera-traps in northeastern Japan. We analyzed the data with the coefficient of temporal overlap, probabilistic co-occurrence analysis, checkerboard score, and multi-response permutation procedures. The results of the assessment of the niche partitioning differed depending on the analytical methods. Therefore, we conclude that the choice of analytical approach is important for understanding the mechanisms of species coexistence through temporal niche partitioning.