2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.107965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dielectric constant, dielectric loss, conductivity, capacitance and model analysis of electronic electroactive polymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen from Figure 4 b, the dielectric constant of the composites increased with the increase in F-graphene content, and the dielectric constant of pure epoxy resin was 4.86 at 1 kHz frequency, while that of F-graphene/epoxy composites reached 8.23 at an F-graphene loading of 1.0 wt.%, which was about 1.69 times that of pure epoxy. This can be attributed to the interfacial polarization effect introduced by F-graphene nanofiller doping, i.e., because of the significant difference in dielectric properties (e.g., polarity and dielectric constant) between inorganic F-graphene and organic epoxy resin matrix, a high-intensity local electric field is formed at the interface of the two phases, and the free electrons generated within the composite dielectric under the applied electric field are captured at the interface of the two phases, i.e., the charge accumulates in the interfacial region with high field strength, which leads to the increase in space charge within the composites and thus the elevation of the dielectric constant [ 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 ]. In this study, the interfacial polarization effect can be explained more intuitively by the micro-capacitance model [ 60 , 61 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen from Figure 4 b, the dielectric constant of the composites increased with the increase in F-graphene content, and the dielectric constant of pure epoxy resin was 4.86 at 1 kHz frequency, while that of F-graphene/epoxy composites reached 8.23 at an F-graphene loading of 1.0 wt.%, which was about 1.69 times that of pure epoxy. This can be attributed to the interfacial polarization effect introduced by F-graphene nanofiller doping, i.e., because of the significant difference in dielectric properties (e.g., polarity and dielectric constant) between inorganic F-graphene and organic epoxy resin matrix, a high-intensity local electric field is formed at the interface of the two phases, and the free electrons generated within the composite dielectric under the applied electric field are captured at the interface of the two phases, i.e., the charge accumulates in the interfacial region with high field strength, which leads to the increase in space charge within the composites and thus the elevation of the dielectric constant [ 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 ]. In this study, the interfacial polarization effect can be explained more intuitively by the micro-capacitance model [ 60 , 61 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of dielectric relaxation is very important to understand the origin of dielectric losses as a potential tool for the determination of the structure and defects existing in solids. The complex dielectric function for the investigated organic dye is expressed by the Debye equation [ 62 ], where ( ω ) and ( ω ) are the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric constant, respectively. The values of ( ω ) and ( ω ) were determined from the measurements of the capacitance and loss tangent tanδ under different temperatures and frequencies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the research and development of IHMs faces severe challenges, researchers have made several attempts to obtain hemostatic materials with good donor supply, shelf life and refrigeration. The structural design of different materials makes an impact on the final performance as well [51][52][53][54][55]. This section will summarize the recent research progress of these hemostatic materials, focusing on the synthesis strategy of IHMs, as shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Synthetic Strategies Of Ihmsmentioning
confidence: 99%