1984
DOI: 10.1080/00268948408072096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dielectric Relaxation Studies on Two Systems Exhibiting the Induced Smectic A Phase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are comparatively higher than many calamatics in their respective phases. 41,42 Similar behaviour was also reported very recently in a binary liquid crystal mixture (rod and bent-core) showing N-SmC a phase transition. 40 Since the activation energy represents the energy barrier associated with the flip-over of the long molecular axis it suggests that the flip-over motion is relatively less easy in hockey stick or bent-core systems than in calamitic liquid crystals.…”
Section: Dielectric Relaxationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These values are comparatively higher than many calamatics in their respective phases. 41,42 Similar behaviour was also reported very recently in a binary liquid crystal mixture (rod and bent-core) showing N-SmC a phase transition. 40 Since the activation energy represents the energy barrier associated with the flip-over of the long molecular axis it suggests that the flip-over motion is relatively less easy in hockey stick or bent-core systems than in calamitic liquid crystals.…”
Section: Dielectric Relaxationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It seems justified to conclude that the thermal expansivity shows a small anisotropy which is more pronounced for the SmA d phase due to the competing effects mentioned already. This supports the suggestion given by Madhusudana et al [21,22] for explaining the decrease of the activation barrier hindering the molecular rotations around the short axes in the SmA phase in relation to the N phase. These authors claimed that this is due to anisotropic packing effects: the volume expansion causes an expansion mainly within the smectic layer, whereas the layer spacing hardly varies with temperature.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…No biphasic regions were detected at high MCB concentrations. Application of pressure (see figures [5][6][7][8][9] shows that a reentrant nematic phase is stabilized by pressure and at about 1010 bar the SA-N, phase boundary meets the N-SA line. The temperature of this invariant point, which we call the crossing point, is 54°C and the concentration xMCB is 0.90.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A hint that both types of phase diagram can be transformed into one another is given by the phase diagram for 4-n-butyloxyphenyl-4'-n-pentyloxybenzoate and 80CB [6]. This phase diagram shows besides the maximum of the induced S, phase a minimum in the phase boundary line N-S, on the 80CB side.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%