2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-8686(03)00048-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dielectric susceptibility of wall adjacent nitrobenzene layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that the thinning of the interlayer results in decreasing its dielectric permittivity. Further, the precise measurement of dielectric properties of nitrobenzene interlayers bounded by metal substrates was carried out [19,20].…”
Section: Dielectric Permittivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was found that the thinning of the interlayer results in decreasing its dielectric permittivity. Further, the precise measurement of dielectric properties of nitrobenzene interlayers bounded by metal substrates was carried out [19,20].…”
Section: Dielectric Permittivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. Thickness dependence of the dielectric permittivity experimentally measured [19] and theoretically (solid line) calculated according to ( 6), (7) in nitrobenzene interlayers bounded by metallic substrates (T = 291 K)…”
Section: Dielectric Permittivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore in these systems, as previously in nematics [1], we should expect the appearance of an associate formation effect due to dipole-dipole molecular interaction. The results of an experimental study of this effect in interlayers of nonmesogens by spectroscopy and dielectric constant measurements have been reported in [2]. Obviously the appearance of an associate formation effect is due to the action of an asymmetric surface force field and intermolecular dispersion interaction between monomer-dimer and dimer-dimer pairs, and also dipole interaction between monomer-monomer pairs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%