“…Finally, data from 228 eligible papers (Figure 2) were extracted by two investigators [6,13,31,33,[37][38][39] (Supplementary List S1). Of the 228 eligible papers, only 35 papers were appropriate based on the risk of bias assessment [31,37,38,47,48,82,94,105,116,127,130,131,[138][139][140][141][144][145][146]157,158,169,173,176,177,[186][187][188][189][190]196,199,214,238,253]. For the meta-analysis, data of standard deviation or error and sample size were additionally needed.…”