2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00203-021-02469-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diesel degradation efficiency of Enterobacter sp., Acinetobacter sp., and Cedecea sp. isolated from petroleum waste dumping site: a bioremediation view point

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This systematic review focuses mainly on the techniques most suitable for the bioremediation of specific pollutants such as heavy metals, hydrocarbons, polymers and their derivatives, and finally organic pollutants. In the wider applicability of the studies mentioned here, it was found that the use of microbial consortia for the bioremediation of heavy metals [11][12][13][14][15][16] and hydrocarbons [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] gave satisfactory results with significant removals. For the biodegradation of polymers, it was found that certain bacterial strains were able to biodegrade plastics in soil [19,[24][25][26][27][28], in contrast to other studies that used bacterial consortia [29][30][31][32], resulting in a significant reduction in these contaminants as well as a reduction in biodegradation time by 90 days [30] and 30 days [31], demonstrating that the symbiotic capacity of bacteria can be a viable option.…”
Section: Bioremediation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This systematic review focuses mainly on the techniques most suitable for the bioremediation of specific pollutants such as heavy metals, hydrocarbons, polymers and their derivatives, and finally organic pollutants. In the wider applicability of the studies mentioned here, it was found that the use of microbial consortia for the bioremediation of heavy metals [11][12][13][14][15][16] and hydrocarbons [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] gave satisfactory results with significant removals. For the biodegradation of polymers, it was found that certain bacterial strains were able to biodegrade plastics in soil [19,[24][25][26][27][28], in contrast to other studies that used bacterial consortia [29][30][31][32], resulting in a significant reduction in these contaminants as well as a reduction in biodegradation time by 90 days [30] and 30 days [31], demonstrating that the symbiotic capacity of bacteria can be a viable option.…”
Section: Bioremediation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Eighteen percent of the studies listed in Table 6 address the bioremediation of soils contaminated with hydrocarbons, and although they use different strategies, all conclude that bioremediation is a viable and effective option for removing this type of contaminant. Most of these studies investigated the degradation capacity of this type of contaminant using bacterial consortia [17][18][19][20][21][22][23], which produced effective results in the removal of aromatic hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds. In other studies, the degradation capacity of specific bacterial strains was evaluated by isolation and inoculation [132], showing a pollutant degradation capacity of up to 81% after 60 days [111].…”
Section: Hydrocarbonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D8 was found to be ampicillin, fucidic acid, novobiosin, bacitracin, streptomycin, lincomycin, penicillin, neomycin, kanamycin, nystatin resistant, gentamicin, tilmicosin semi-susceptible, chloramphenicol, tetracycline sensitive (Table 2). E. ludwigii CCUG 51323 T strain was also found to be sensitive to gentamicin, but resistant to ampicillin [35].…”
Section: Antibiotic Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…выяснено, что Enterobacter sp. имеет потенциал в деградации дизельного топлива и других нефтяных масел [111].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified