2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2010.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diet and particularly seafood are major sources of perfluorinated compounds in humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
149
6
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 288 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
10
149
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, market basket studies have shown that dietary intake of PFOS derived mainly from fish and seafood in Spain 10) , and cereals and cereal products, milk and dairy products, fish and seafood, and meat and meat products in Norway 2) . Two previous reports also reported that consumption of fish and shellfish was positively correlated with plasma or serum concentrations of PFOS in Norway 9,31) . In contrast, meat, but not fish, was a significant predictor of PFOS levels in plasma among pregnant Danish women 11) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, market basket studies have shown that dietary intake of PFOS derived mainly from fish and seafood in Spain 10) , and cereals and cereal products, milk and dairy products, fish and seafood, and meat and meat products in Norway 2) . Two previous reports also reported that consumption of fish and shellfish was positively correlated with plasma or serum concentrations of PFOS in Norway 9,31) . In contrast, meat, but not fish, was a significant predictor of PFOS levels in plasma among pregnant Danish women 11) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, there is still debate over the sources of dietary exposure to PFOS and PFOA in humans. Several reports have indicated that PFOS and PFOA were transferred into the human body mainly through fish intake 9,10) . On the other hand, research in Denmark showed positive associations between concentrations of PFOS in blood and consumption of red meat, animal fat and snacks, but not fish 11) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RfD for PFOS is 0.025 μg/g/d, which was established on the basis of the rat chronic carcinogenicity studies (Thayer, 2002). The ADI of PFOS of all nine fish species Concentration (ng/g ww) and Norway (0.78 ng/kg/d) (Haug et al, 2010). This reflects the combination of both high (but not exceptionally high) PFOS levels and relatively high fish consumption rates in this region.…”
Section: Risk Assessment Through Fish Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food consumption is believed to be the major pathway for human exposure to PFASs, contributing more than 60 percent of total lifetime exposure (Tittlemier et al, 2007). In particular, fish has been suggested as the most important source of PFASs exposed to humans through dietary route (Haug et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, occupational exposure such as indoor dust intake, TSP intake, and diet were found to be the main exposure routes of PFAAs in the workers (Figure 4), which were rather different from those for the general populations. 18,22,24 For PFOS and PFHxS, the most predominant direct exposure pathway was via indoor dust intake, which accounted for 88.4 and 67.3%, respectively, followed by dietary intake, which accounted for 8.88% of PFOS and 31.6% of PFHxS. However, for PFOA, intake via TSP was the predominant route of exposure in the occupational workers, and it accounted for 67.9% of ∑PFOA, followed by indoor dust (17.2%) and diet (14.8%).…”
Section: Environmental Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%