2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.fooweb.2021.e00201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diet and trophic niche overlap among a native waterbird and two non-native herbivores in Pampas grasslands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Niche partitioning reduces interspecific competition, allowing for the sympatric coexistence of two species with similar ecological niches (Hardin, 1960; Schoener, 1974). Understanding how closely related species overlap or differentiate their diets and habitat use can aid in their management (Fernandez et al, 2021). The federally listed southern Distinct Population Segment (sDPS) of green sturgeon, Acipenser medirostris , and the California State Species of Special Concern, white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus , are two closely related sister taxa that live sympatrically in the San Francisco estuary (SFE) system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Niche partitioning reduces interspecific competition, allowing for the sympatric coexistence of two species with similar ecological niches (Hardin, 1960; Schoener, 1974). Understanding how closely related species overlap or differentiate their diets and habitat use can aid in their management (Fernandez et al, 2021). The federally listed southern Distinct Population Segment (sDPS) of green sturgeon, Acipenser medirostris , and the California State Species of Special Concern, white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus , are two closely related sister taxa that live sympatrically in the San Francisco estuary (SFE) system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies consider dietary and habitat overlap between livestock and wildlife as a proof that there is competition between them (Butt & Turner, 2012;Chaikina & Ruckstuhl, 2006;Fernandez et al, 2021;Koetke et al, 2020). Although they are important in expressing the competition between livestock and wildlife, they do not give the concrete proof that when they occur there is competition (Butt & Turner, 2012).…”
Section: Views On the Impact Of Wildlife Livestock Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-way ANOVA was used to compare the mean difference of species consumed by both animals across the three periods. The calculated mean of the species consumed by buffalo and livestock was used to plot bipartite ecological networks and portray the extent to which foraging resources are shared between buffalo and livestock in MKGR (Fernandez et al, 2021;Pansu et al, 2019) using the R function (plotweb).…”
Section: (Iv) Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%