1999
DOI: 10.1017/s1047759400017979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diet in the Roman world: a regional inter-site comparison of the mammal bones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
102
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 296 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
102
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Pork was the most popular meat consumed by the Romans, followed by sheep and goats' meat (approximately 25 to 50%). However, consumption varied by region and chronology (King, 1999). Zooarchaeological studies concur that the predominant domesticates in Southern Portugal during the Roman period and Late Antiquity were ovicaprines (sheep and goats) and pigs, followed by cattle (for the Alentejo region see: MacKinnon, 1999MacKinnon, -2000Cardoso and Detry, 2005; similar results for Horta da Torre (personal communication by M. J. Valente)).…”
Section: Dietary Patternsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Pork was the most popular meat consumed by the Romans, followed by sheep and goats' meat (approximately 25 to 50%). However, consumption varied by region and chronology (King, 1999). Zooarchaeological studies concur that the predominant domesticates in Southern Portugal during the Roman period and Late Antiquity were ovicaprines (sheep and goats) and pigs, followed by cattle (for the Alentejo region see: MacKinnon, 1999MacKinnon, -2000Cardoso and Detry, 2005; similar results for Horta da Torre (personal communication by M. J. Valente)).…”
Section: Dietary Patternsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The most obvious would be to re-express the NISP for each taxon as a percentage of the total. The resulting three percentages can then be plotted on a tripolar graph, a procedure used by King (1999). There are two objections to this approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evidence for changes in cattle carcass processing has implications both in economic and social terms. Beef production became more important in the Roman period (King 1999) and the need to provision towns in particular led to significant changes in how animals were acquired, processed and their products distributed. It is possible to trace the activities of specialist processors and to recognise where they operated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%