“…Handling/detoxifying of defensive compounds in its plant diet also comes at a cost to developmental traits and warning signal expression (Lindstedt et al, 2010 ; Reudler et al, 2015 ). Similarly, the fecundity of cardenolide‐sequestering Oncopeltus fasciatus milkweed bugs was reduced when constantly artificially maintained on cardenolide‐containing diet, although in general, cardenolide exposure was associated with positive fitness effects (Pokharel et al, 2021 ).In the gregarious social Diprion pini pine sawfly, increased allocation to defensive secretion incurs costs in growth, immunity, and survival (Björkman & Larsson, 1991 ; Lindstedt et al, 2018 ), and in the pipevine swallowtail ( Battus philenor ) butterfly, toxin content is negatively correlated with fat content (Fordyce & Nice, 2008 ). Most evidence of defense costs is from the very few studies on species that biosynthesize their own chemical defenses, in contrast to the more numerous studies on species which sequester the defensive compounds of their host plants and often show neutral or positive fitness consequences of increasing defense levels (reviewed by: Bowers, 1992 ; Ruxton et al, 2018 ; Zvereva & Kozlov, 2016 ).…”