2023
DOI: 10.3390/nu15173671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dietary Fibre Intake in Chile: 13 Years after the Last National Report

Carla Guzmán-Pincheira,
Jonathan Espinoza,
Samuel Durán-Agüero
et al.

Abstract: Background: The objective is to provide updated data on the intake of total dietary fibre in the population residing in Chile and to identify food sources that contribute most to its intake, as well as its association with different sociodemographic and nutritional status-related determinants. Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, a nationwide survey was applied to determine fibre intake using an instrument that has been previously validated in the resident population of Chile. Results: The sampl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 62 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, both intermediate clusters had a common factor of low fruit and vegetable consumption, which is not surprising in the Chilean context. The Chilean population (90%) does not reach the fiber recommendation and positions bread as the main fiber supplier food with 4.39 ± 3.05 g/day, while fruits and vegetables contribute only 1.54 ± 1.49 and 1.85 ± 1.59 g/day, respectively [ 53 ]. However, although both clusters had low fiber intake, one was characterized by high sugar consumption, while the other was not (LFV-HSD vs. LFV-LSD).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, both intermediate clusters had a common factor of low fruit and vegetable consumption, which is not surprising in the Chilean context. The Chilean population (90%) does not reach the fiber recommendation and positions bread as the main fiber supplier food with 4.39 ± 3.05 g/day, while fruits and vegetables contribute only 1.54 ± 1.49 and 1.85 ± 1.59 g/day, respectively [ 53 ]. However, although both clusters had low fiber intake, one was characterized by high sugar consumption, while the other was not (LFV-HSD vs. LFV-LSD).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%